It does have third party support. Just not muli-platform games which I have a PC for the best versions of any way.
"SEGA" has never teased Shenmue 3.
Everyone expect Sony. Which happens to be losing the most money according to reports. *shrugs*
Though there are an especially large group of people who seem to want to see Nintendo fail.
That's all on your there.
If I want to play a game, I buy the system its own. Otherwise, I shut my mouth and go play something else.
You'll never hear me saying something like "just sucks cause I won't be playing it" about anything.
Despite the heavy disagrees he is getting, False-Patriot is right.
The developer has outright said on two occasions, once right after the initial reveal and again after the name reveal, that Xenoblade X is not a sequel to Xenoblade Chronicles. Its a spiritual successor.
Also, its only Xenoblade "Chronicles X" in America because some marketer likely decided that adding Chronicles back into the name would help cash in on the name sake. The dev didn...
Downplaying the achievements in support of promoting competitors is not something someone does out of love.
How do you dominate in second place?
Ummm, wasn't it just overtaken by the 3DS again?
Yeah, everyone knew about Devil's Third, Splatoon and Bayonetta 1 and the new Star Fox.
And once again, you push multiplatform games that no one would have bought on the console even if they were their as having some huge impact which they never have.
Apparently, Platinum Games, Capcom, Square Enix, SEGA, and Activision, and all of the other companies that are releasing AAA games are all Nintendo subsidiaries now, because Nintendo doesn't get AAA game...
So much disparagement in this article, which is honestly running with a crap headline. It has been said since the beginning by anyone with common sense that the Wii U did not need saving and that it would be fine. All it needs and all it ever needed was more games.
Whenever someone says anything that amounts to Nintendo doing well, you can always expect the Nintendo hate force to exploit every angle to dismiss to downplay and/or spin it.
There was no new major mario game announced, just a game creator that hardly anyone cared about.
Zelda sells have never been big enough to save or sink anything. The series is only popular in the west.
Most of the buzz I saw was for Bayonetta, Devil's Third, Splatoon and Xenoblade X. None of which have anything to do with Zelda or Mario. Smash Brothers was the most talked about game at e3 according to charts.
Of course, Nintendo haters wi...
The current gen version came out in 2013 on the Wii U. It was originally suppose to be the only version and it stilled heralded as the best.
This would be a stupid idea. If a handheld is the same as the console, then there is no point in getting though.
Also, if they mean making games that will play on both sytem, then that would mean that the stronger system would be perpetually held back by the weaker one.
A unified platform is just a dumb idea to me. I like be able to pick of different devices and getting a different experience from each one.
The Wonderful 101 was no a flop. It was never expected to sale ridiculous amounts.
Nintendo only shipped 30k units in Japan. ]
Whether or not something is a flop depends on how much money is made/lost. W101 likely cost 1/10 of what most of these huge titles like Watchdogs and Titanfall cost to make. More than likely, 200 or 300k was all it needed to sale and W101 did over 200k worldwide.
@Consoleslateagain, I agree 100%.
Exclusives get so much undo praise for no other reason than them being exclusive.
Fire Emblem is first party.
You do know that if this ruling is upheld, then Sony will be just a guilty and possibly Microsoft for Move, Playstation Eye, the Sixaxis, and Kinect
Also, the patents they are being sued for were given to Philips years after the Wii had already been on sell. One was in 2011 after Nintendo has already stopped supporting the Wii.
Though haters like you rarely care about facts. All you want is for something bad to happen to Nintendo and a excuse to trash talk th...
Link doesn't look feminine. He looks like a young Japanese male with the features of an elf.
The only Zelda game in which link was an Adult was Ocarina of Time. In the rest he was maybe 17 or younger. People are mistaking youth with femininity.
Link has never looked feminine to me even in that Zelda Wii U trailer. His frame, while slim, has always been too toned and muscular. He looks like a young male elf with Japanese facial features.
The way people are praise knockoffs disgusting sometimes. I'd image that it has more to do with this being a Metroid ripoff for a Sony hardware more than anything. Otherwise, most of these people wouldn't even care.
There is another Metroid knockoff(Reven I believe) that preceded this, but it didn't get these types of comments.
I actually selected Nintendo because I prefer more "mature" tone games.
I don't consider stuff like call of duty and Madden mature. Especially when I actually see the types of people who play them.
Generally, people who play Nintendo consoles have always been the most mature in my experience.