Nintendo spent nearly 2 years on developing the Wii U after it was announced to create customized processors and MCB connectivity. They came up with the gamepad concept in 2007. All devs who have made games for the console say it has far exceeded the performance that its specs suggest.
Sony and Microsoft haven't even spent one year on the PS4 or Xboxone, and they are both just using derivatives of stock hardware that have proven to under-perform what their raw numbers sa...
The Wii, and the GBA, and DS, and the 3DS.
Also, the Gamecube made profit in case you forgot(or more than likely never knew).
Nintendo haters are like Republicans. They live in a different reality.
Your comment is ignorance at its prime. lol, what!? :)
"The fans" faiths in him hasn't waned at all. The only people who dislike Iwata are people who want Nintendo to fail, Nintendo haters in other words.
The Wii U is starting to pick up steam with sells in the U.S. being on the same level as the PS3/360/3DS now.
They just need to get it up to those levles in Europe and Japan and all that will take is the right games.
Iwata is doing a great job.
Ubisoft wouldn't be much better(looks at Assassin's Creed 4 DLC)
Always has to be something about Sony in the first post.
He's always trolling when it comes to Nintendo. I think the only positive article about Nintendo I've never seen him troll was the one where SEGA said Nintendo consoles were the best for Sonic games.
There was nothing there he could spin.
Not as much as a disappointment as people like you are to the entire gaming community.
I feel disappointed for gaming as a whole every time I see someone who thinks like you.
Hmmm, will it look superior to hardware that came out a year later with a higher price tag?
That is unlikely. I doubt Nitnendo was able to time travel and acquire 2013 tech back in 2011.
Its because of people who like you that they have to make comments like this.
They make the statements to shut up remarks like "its so sad that they have to compare it to the only other consoles that are currently out" but apparently it doesn't work.
Then why get any of the next gen consoles? All of them are only slightly better visually than the last gen reality.
The impact of specs on graphics has become small. You have to spend $400 for a marginal increase in overall fidelity.
The Wii U allows people to do it at a lower price and with a more unique controller.
I'll let you know how much my PC copy is superior to anything you'll ever get on the PS4 as well.
Indeed. if it was innovative, then Microsoft wouldn't have copied it with Smart Glass, and Sony wouldn't have copied it with the DS4.
Why would they want to lose over $200 on each console?
I was hoping for some actual new side quests, but this is fine. I will pick this up eventually.
Absolutely. Honestly, this game and Bayonetta 2 are next gen games I am most looking forward to out of all of the next gen games.
It honestly looks the most next gen to me as well.
This game will be bought.
RPGs are what the Wii U needs.
No one seems happy to here this.
I am though :).
That is a complete lie. The Wii U GPU was a downclocked clocked HD 4850 at the lowest, because that is what the dev kits were using up until at least e3 2012, 5 months before launch. The actual GPU wasn't finish until a few months right before the console launched in November.
If the Wii U GPU were any weaker than a 4850 that, then none of the games that had been in development on the 4850 GPU devkits would have run at all anymore. The Wii U GPU tech is actually more in ...
The entire "save the Wii U" garbage was cooked up by Sony fanboys to elevate the status of games that most people expect not to sale that much to supposed system seller status, only to bash them as failures when they don't do what the Sony fanboys imposed, but was never stated by Nintendo supports.
The Wii U system sellers are going to be Mario Kart 8, Smash Brothers U, Legend of Zelda U, Bayonetta 2 and Monolith's X.
Anyone who try to paint...