Lennoxb63

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 121750

How would that affect your enjoyment of the campaign?

2456d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well for one, the X1X runs better than the majority of PCs out there now.

2459d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

My question is, will they be able to sell this service to gamers who get games exponentially cheaper than console gamer's anyway? I mean a brand new AAA game is already almost half the cost than it is when it releases on console.

2459d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Doesn't really matter with franchises as big as COD. It's going to sell whether it has a campaign or not.

2459d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Says that Google Stadia's hardware may not be able to run GTA 6. Google is going to have to do another upgrade when next gen consoles come along. Or they'll be behind at the beginning of it.

2460d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Likely a cross gen game. With the PS5 adding more bells and whistles.

2460d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

PC Gears of War players still get slaughtered by console players all the time.

2461d ago 3 agree7 disagreeView comment

No, I'm not saying that games ONLY sell because of it's graphics. But that its one of, if not the biggest selling point. Devs are not going to sacrifice graphics for frames when most gamers don't even know what frames are. There are games that aren't even really games (more like interactive movies) that have sold because the graphics were so good. No game has sold because it has a higher frame rate,

2461d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

30fps has been the standard for about 3 gens now. It's time for yall to give up this hope of 60fps becoming the standard other than for competitive and/or fast games. It's not gonna happen. Frames don't sell games. So it's not worth it to developers. Most gamers don't even know what a frame rate is.

You have to understand. Devs risk losing sales next gen if they sacrifice graphics for a higher frames. If games look like they do now next gen with a higher...

2462d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Who is "Us?" Speak for yourself.

2464d ago 14 agree21 disagreeView comment

No. No explanation needed. Should be obvious if you know tech.

2466d ago 8 agree2 disagreeView comment

The risk of making single player games are definitely higher. But they still make too much money to just die off. Never heard any publishers say that single player games are dying. Only that the risk is higher. Heard them say turn based RPGs are dying though. Which is somewhat true.

2466d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

People who keep saying their worried about single player gamer are being led astray by the success stories of multiplayer games. Single player games never have and never will die. Stop this tired agenda.

2467d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sony is just as guilty as MS. How many cinematic 3rd person adventure games are we gonna get?

2468d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

They aren't mistaking Grid 2 screenshots for car advertisements so I call bull.

2468d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Although, they’re nothing compared to Google’s tbh..."

Azure surpassed Google's and Amazon's cloud infrastructure a few years ago.

2470d ago 10 agree1 disagreeView comment

I'm struggling to find the article where Sony/MS/Nintendo say cloud gaming will be the only option.

2470d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

You can be banned from playing your physical copy.

2470d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

You think Google is going to push MS out of the console business? When the most experience google has had with gaming in recent years is the Play Store? Yea right.

2470d ago 11 agree0 disagreeView comment

You're confusing Phil with Don.

2472d ago 6 agree5 disagreeView comment