I'm not worried.
Most other reviews say it takes around 8-12 hours and that's good enough for me.
Finishing it at 6 probably just means he or she practically raced to the finish.
So, were ODST and Reach your first Halo purchases, then, assuming that you refuse to buy a Halo game without firefight mode? Because those were the only games in the entire series that had firefight mode.
Lol...ok, buddy. Whatever you say.
Testing within the company??
On-line isn't the only way to test out the mp modes.
I didn't see any problem in his review nor his tone. It's obvious the reviewer is just excited and likes what he sees in Halo 4 and he is just conveying that.
I'd rather see a little excitement and quirkiness in a video review rather than listen to a static, boring, flat listen.
many other websites (well-known ones) also gave odst a 9 over over. Does that make those untrusted as well?
Great, and here come the kids...
At least you didn't torture us with the term "gaylo."
Lol, you lost all interest in a potential Halo pc game immediately just because you got a disagree or two??
Some logic you've got going on in that head of yours..
I honestly don't know why there are people disagreeing with you.
This is all in-game, people.
@hufandpuf
the chief got knocked down by a blast, got smashed against the rocks, and the knight was obviously overpowering him in the ambush.
Why wouldn't it be logical to think that the chief got captured at that moment?
Perhaps as the knight was pinning him down, the didact or other knights appeared and aided the other knight.
Awesome trailer.
I wish david fincher and miller made a movie together.
That's pretty much dead-on how I feel.
Call of duty is like the mcdonald's of the industry. And then there are titles like Assassin's Creed, Halo, Dishonored that are the 5-star restaurants- less sales, but superior in quality and innovation.
You're going about it all wrong.
That's not what they're doing here and have been doing for the past 5 years.
They encourage fan fiction, machinimas, commentaries, etc. so long as large established companies don't take advantage of it without a proper contract. This doesn't affect ordinary youtube individuals.
to the author: You're more of a child than you think if you let a simple crouch ability of a mech get in the way of you getting a game.
Last time I take you seriously...
the thing is, retailers don't have copies of the game this early, so it's basically either being stolen from manufacturing facilities or it's the torrented copy.
This shouldn't have been approved in the fist place.
It's leaked footage and isn't hosted by a contracted website to show off Halo 4 gameplay.
Haven't these guidelines existed since 2007??
I thought that some user just noticed them right now since Halo 4 is coming out and everyone decided to blow up against the rules, even though they've been around for 5 years.
MS/343i even said that they turn a blind eye toward revenue generated by ordinary individuals on youtube, so long as it's not by a large company that has yet to ink a partnership with microsoft or machinima.
Lol...ok, buddy. Whatever you say.
And btw, the GoW series can be classified into "bullet sponge" as well. Actually, both GoW and Halo are pretty much equal in terms of kill-time. And in GoW, they actually usually have to get downed first before they die, so wouldn't you hate that as well?
In terms of power, no. But, input-wise, maybe.
I'm not getting call of duty this year. Still having fun with mw 2 and call of duty 4.