Do you have any original post? Lately in all the stories I have seen you in, all your post have been negative about said game/developer/publisher. Get over yourself, these games are meant for fun, if this looks fun then play it, if not STFU already or better yet since you seem to be the master of ideas try to set-up a pitch-meeting for yourself and see if a publisher will make a game based on something you created.
This article makes no sense, the PSP-3000 has two video settings. It has a Progressive Scan resolution and an Interlaced resolution. The reason Sony added an Interlaced resolution to the PSP-3000 was because of their video out function. Most older TV's don't support a progressive resolution, so with the PSP-2000 series if you used the Video out function your TV set would not except the signal because the signal was Progressive. With the PSP-3000 they have both Progressive and interlaced reso...
Everybody can thank Micheal Jackson for this.
Whether you like or dislike this move, thank Micheal.
What Flip-flop are you talking about, You named Red dot and Silencers.
These are not in the game.
Granted Aperture sights and Suppressors serve basically the same purpose, but they are not the same. A car is a car but a Chevy isn't a Ford.
Again stop your lying, There are no red dot sight in CoD:WaW, not even in the Beta.
There are (and this is just for the Thompson) Aperture sights, Suppressors and Round Drum for the Thompson. There is no Red Dots in the game. Anywhere. Not in the PC or 360 beta. I know cause I have played both. So quit your lying.
Nice try TROLL. But the weapons on CoD:WaW do not have Red dots or silencers on them. Those are modern modification that do not fit the WWII timeframe.
Again nice try but at least come up with something more Feasible. Also how did you get an early copy of the game? It's not out for another 2 weeks.
DAMN TROLLS.
CoD 4 did not have Tanks in them and CoD: WaW does which forces players to account for something else then just a foot soldier. also they have CTF and War which are welcomed additions to the game.
Also the maps in CoD:WaW are better in every aspect then the ones find in CoD4.
IMO.
It goes both ways. If you look at CoD: United Offensive and CoD 3 while those games were "Weak" in comparison to IW releases they made great improvements over the base game that found themselves in IW releases.
Also CoD3 was made in 8 months. I challenge you to find a Dev that has made a game in 8 months that played as well as CoD3.
You won't find one.
1. While it might take you a few seconds to get into a ranked server on R2 it takes me on average 10-15 mins to get into a ranked game no matter where and when I try. Also there are times when I do get into a ranked game back to back, but why is it that when the ranked game is over I get kicked out back to the main shell? I would like to play more then 1 ranked game at a time, you know so I can rank up. Also I have been dropped from 3 ranked games which blows. While my experience seems to d...
Poor Kotaku, seems it's only an issue when a PS3 game gets high scores.
I guess fanboys aren't only for consoles anymore.
I'm in the R2 beta, between R2 and CoD:Waw Beta the CoD beta is far more polished then R2. Granted both have bugs, but at least I am able to rank up through out my whole playtime in CoD. Unlike waiting 10-15 to get into a ranked game in R2. Both need to be fixed, but CoD is showing more polish then R2 when it comes to MP.
Noah Heller? I think he is the same guy who was talking mess about Gearbox a while back and back then everybody thought he worked at Treyarch when really he worked at Activision, why do websites continue to make the same mistakes. They need to make sure they get who is saying what, because it can lead to confusion.
http://www.joystiq.com/2008...
Small price for not having players skip around the map.
Actually I am in the beta and I am somewhat surprised but this score.
There is nothing wrong with the actual game itself, but there are many different glitches in the beta itself that have me waiting for fixes or announcement of fixes before I buy this game.
1. Rank games take far to long to get into. I spend 10 to 15 minutes trying to get into a ranked match and when I finally get into a game I only get one game then I'm booted out to the main shell again waitin...
CAN"T FUC!EN WAIT!!!!!!.
This might make me get a 360 with a gold membership so I can whoop all your candya$$'s through both consoles.
The beta is sweet, WAR is by far the best game mode availible and they have CTF. This game makes better use of the Perk system all together.
I wish people wouldn't sleep on this game it is extremly fun and well balanced.
I think we are on board with Sega and what they meant to the industry so I will leave that a mute point in this posting.
I will disagree with you on Sony not having to rely on first party titles to regain their position, because thats exactly what they need to happen. Because Sony is not losing third party titles they are losing Third party exclusives, games like GTA, Guitar Hero and now Final Fantansy are no longer exclusive to the PS3 but still appear on the PS3, so Sony rea...
http://n4g.com/News-15824.a...
Follow the link Captain, I wasn't wrong.
I was just off on the timeframe but the attach rate was exremly low at one point.
Thats always a good sign, given the growing economic issues that plague this country it's good to know that people are still willing to pay for a good time.
One a side note I am surprised to see how well the PS3 ratio is doing, this time last year I remember their Attach ratio being 1.3 or some pathetic low@ss number.
Viva gamers and thier open wallets, the only people not worried to spend money as long as they have a good time with it. If the rest of the country ...
Both, this level can be played in either SP, Split-screen or online Co-Op.