f@CK
I wasn't aware WOW was a military MMO shooter.
MGS4 does run at 720P natively, it doesn't do 1080i/p natively and only upscales to those resolutions when there is very little going on. But during battle sequences all that action is all 720P natively.
@DJ
You sir are wrong about the Cell. It does render graphics thats the main job for cell. The reason why the RSX GPU was put into the PS3 was for texture and refresh fill rate help.
Meaning Cell is a beast when rendering graphics by itself, but cell i...
This game is too small to be a stand alone hit. Valve should've packaged this title with portal and Team fortress 2 in a bundle and sold it that way. but itself Left 4 Dead is a ripoff at $60.
Fun? Yes
Worth $60? NO!
in answer to your question all you have to do is look at the post directly above you and realize it was all a joke.
Loosen up the whity-tighties and have a laugh.
Deathrow, take your "OPEN ZONE===>" comment to the open zone don't be jealous because Gears is a world class AAA title that you can't play on your PissStation 3.
GEARS 2 AAAAA!!!!!!!!! FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And before people start getting all stupid with the fanboy responses, its a joke people. Stop acting like these games represent life and death. We play games to escape issues like that and when fanboys tack on fake emotional values to games/c...
The PC portion of this comparison was B.S. The reason he was getting sorry performance was because he was running the game on a Quad-core.
I know it sounds weird but this game was optimized for PC's with dual cores.
A simple fix for this is to launch the game, bring up your "Task Manager" and "Set Affinity" for the game to only run on 2-cores instead of 4. This will remove tons of Latency the game experiences when trying to run on more than 2-...
GOTY confirmed, only a masterpiece such as Gears2 can have so many glaring issues and still get rave reviews from all the major websites.
Little ball people and retardsistance 2 can only dream to be in the same league as Gears 2 HAHAHAHAHAH!!!
GOTY year confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!
MY PS3 just turned 2 yesterday and it still ticking.
All I can say is "PTRS-41". Read up on that anti-tank sniper rifle. That gun was way more bad ass then the Barret .50 Cal.
If that is true for R2 then the truth be told for Halo3, Gears2 because those games are pretty much the same was their predecessors . all these games are overhyped in my opinion but are fun to play.
So play them.
funny man right here, last time I checked PS3 did Blu-ray movies and movie downloads.
So what now mister kim?
This review is a joke. Trash CoD:WaW then recommand Brothers in Arms.
WoW. I guess another review from a Treyarch hater.
Plus no mention of CooP, Zombies or any details on MP other then
"The multiplayer is pretty much what you would expect from a sequel to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. Actually a bit less, seeing as it's pretty much the same, except different weapons and levels and the fact that it's all been done before."
This r...
I can respect that opinion, CoD4 was a great step for the series to take but they had 2 years+ to make that game happen. Treyarch was given only 8 months to do CoD3 but even then they managed to put some improvements into the core gameplay like running and throwing back grenades. And now CoD:Waw is out and Treyarch was given a full dev cycle. they could have easily followed CoD4 to the "T" and simply cashed in on the series name, but instead they used that time to put in 4-player C...
The video is subjective because, they used Component cables instead of HDMI. The 360 by far has better video quality when using Component cables, thats the reason you see some of the fuzz around certain areas on the PS3.
But when using HDMI the PS3 has a sharpness to it that is very noticeable. In that sense if you were to plug in both the 360 and PS3 via HDMI on the same TV with the same settings, outside of the button prompts you will not be able to tell the difference.
I not stating that Treyarch revolutionized the CoD series because they didn't. But they put in a huge improvement into the series that players give them no credit, that being 4-player CooP. In a gaming world were people are always talking about CooP this and that, Treyarch put that into the CoD series but get little to no credit for it. And when next year rolls around that same 4-player CooP will be found in IW's game and players will jump for joy because IW "Finally" put CooP in t...
you are wrong. An engine is just that an engine. And when talking about Treyarch not putting in work because of that engine you look damn right foolish. The engine is great for graphics and the MP that CoD4 already had which this game more or less keeps the same. But what about the new 4-player coop in the game. Granted its the one "HUGE" addition that Treyarch put into the game but that alone must've taken some time to do since IW didn't know how to put it into CoD4. Not only is t...
How did this game get passed Sony Submission. there are so many bugs that this patched fixed, it would appear as if it was broken upon release. Somebody dropped the ball on this version of the game.
Either 2K needs to get better QA personal or Sony needs to get better QA personal cause a patch to fix so many bugs is really unacceptable.
Good thing that the game has been "fixed" but this game should have never been release to the public in the state it was...
When it comes to The Beatles.
Great band, but I don't think there are a Great Band to put into a game.
Now if you can do Rock Band or Guitar Hero: Led Zeppelin. that would be AWESOME!!!!!!!
Good review but why is there no mention that Sony Exclusive titles like Resistance 1 and 2, Warhawk and a few others use dedicated servers for their online games. Thats a big plus if you ask me. That was one of the reasons why I bought Warhawk last year. Then when I was able to play on a European server with a ping under 200 (I'm in California) that was AWESOME!!!