All Channels
Popular

kingduqc

Member
CRank: 5Score: 42800

Consoles can't do 60 fps again.

This has been a standard for over 10 years now on pc, sucks to be forced into choppy games.

I mean look at consoles game on ps3 today, they dip all the time in the low 20's and you guys still buy it. oh well, guess they aren't use to high standard.

4433d ago 6 agree8 disagreeView comment

Cause it's 100$ cheaper?

I mean, there is like 1 game to play on ps4 that is exclusive and good.

4433d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Dayz is still 2 years from release.

Optimization come in the beta stage and it's still months away from that.

4433d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I already know the resolution. 2560*1440.

4433d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

well 4k is playable at 60 fps without breaking the bank, there isn't any 8k monitor so you need multimonitors for that... kinda getting expensive

4434d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

I like how console fanboy argue about this when it's made for pc and they are clueless on what it is.

4434d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

PC or GTFO

1440p master race heuheuheuehue

4434d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

30 fps,

lul potatos

4434d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Having no jaggies without using AA that blur the image?

Why not... cause he can.

4434d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Games on consoles are so expensive, most of those sales are over the pc game at normal price.

4435d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

So sad for consoles they won't get g sync tech. I've seen it and it's quite fantastic.

4435d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Grats?welcome to 2007 consoles

4435d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Pc gamers have games so cheap they dont have enough time to play em all and you find a way to complain. How fun is the ps4 with its 3 game?

4435d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

720p is 0.900m pixels

1440p is 3.600

25 fps vs 60 fps

the difference is 23 million pixel per second vs 221 million pixels per second. Almost 10 times more shown on the screen isn't "few" and for a game you plat hundred of hours well it's well worth it.

4436d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Beastforlifenoob :

1.) It's about hardware limitations and this hardware happens to be pc tech.

2.) I would rather play those games on pc in 1440p 60 fps with more details and particles and I woulrd rather those dev being able to sell on more then one platform so they can have a bigger fan base and more money (because they deserve it for all the hard work) but it's true it's not possible. In a perfect world it would. But frankly it's not the ...

4436d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

CPU a Bottleneck

lulululul

>next gen

1.7ghz mobile cpu

4437d ago 11 agree5 disagreeView comment

256 hours in the alpha and no hackers yet. Hacker where a plague on the mod but the alpha its quite enjoyable. Glad to see the game getting a bigger audience but i dont see the avetage console gamer liking dayz or the game being release without major downgrade

4437d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why are you fucking complaining? Turn down 2-3 settings. That's exactly what it's for, scaling. from low end older cards to uber high end. Boo hoo you can't run msaa at 8x

4438d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

get it on pc and use a controller? Problem solved.

In 5-8 years you'll be able to play it in 4k if you want to play again with newer controllers. you won't on a console.

4438d ago 11 agree4 disagreeView comment

console gamer are so funny, having to wait for new tech lul

4438d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment