Do you not get the fact that Wikipedia is not a viable source? I do not know of a single college or university that accepts Wikipedia as a viable source of research. It might be fine in some high schools, which is what you sound like: a high school student, but in the real world, Wikipedia is recognized as a joke because there is no standard of accountability with regards to the information in the entries,
There is no such thing as a consensus in science. There is only fact. If 9...
The post that revealed the EU boxart called this one "clearly filler" and Examiner takes it as real.
EDIT: how about the fact that it has a RP logo on it and "Coming Soon" and the fact that it looks like total crap compared to the EU boxart? Just because every retailer has it doesn't mean this is the final boxart; it could mean that this was the placeholder image they used until the boxart is finalized.
EDIT2: Also, if you look at the slideshow, t...
Not to break into your logical debate of Kaveti's analogy, but most moral codes consider cheating to be immoral as it displays a lack of integrity.
EDIT: Also, the analogy is weak because a bank not having enough security is not analogous to exploiting a glitch in the code of a game. The reason being that by exploiting the glitch, a favorable situation results from the individuals actions. For the analogy to be acceptable the conditions would have to be changed.
For...
Don't you have children to eat and a bridge to go home to?
EDIT: Bungie, they did show gameplay that is more than QTE. Actually, there hasn't been much QTE style gameplay except for the fight in the junkyard. You are confusing a unique control interface with QTE. Also, they have evolved the idea of QTE from the whole "Press X to not die" to QTEs that aren't failed but the outcome depends upon how you play them.
First of all, you're right this isn't news. But 50% of all "news" is editorial anyway so why are you surprised?
The system isn't flawed, the community is. If people could put aside their fanboy tendencies and approve posts based on merit, 1. There would only be about 10 new posts a day; and 2. This wouldn't be N4G.
IGN is stirring the pot, and for several reasons: 1. Gamers are competitive by nature and it gets easy hits; 2. It is the slow season. All the ...
I called you a moron because you think that demos are not meant to be judged. They are. I agree that demos should be taken with a grain of salt but the whole point of a demo is to have people judge the game favorably and then go buy it. Just because you have some personal experience that changes how you view demos, it doesn't change the purpose of the demo, which is to have people judge the game.
You are supposed to judge a game off of the demo. That is what it's for: to give people a sample of the game and to give them a chance to decide if they are interested in the game. when people make a decision, they make a judgement call one way or the other. Demos are meant to be judged you moron.
Are you really that stupid? A developer, who solely develops for the PS3, talking about why the game they are working on can't work on another platform because of the storage medium and the the processor architecture are so radically different that the game as it is would simply not work from a technical standpoint is talking sh1t? Grow the fvck up!
While people do take Valve's comments a bit too seriously, the fact remains that Valve is the only developer that continues to have...
It said there will be a shower scene involving a dude. It didn't say that his cack will be flopping around on screen. There are plenty of male shower scenes in movies. Just because the girl takes most of it off, doesn't mean that you'll see the meat and potatoes in this scene.
That's what 2nd party means. A studio that is independent but makes games exclusively for 1 console. Sony is really good to insomniac so it would take something huge for them to throw it all away.
Reading is hard, huh?
It is referring to today. I played yesterday as well, but today it didn't work. It's not fake.
I already reported him for resubmitting this story.
How do you review a game's MP aspect when nobody has the game? Especially when trying to play said game tags you as a pirate? This "review" is bullshit.
EDIT: Yes, actually that would be great. Well, depending on the "proof," that is. It still doesn't change the fact that this review is bullshit.
EDIT 2: Still waiting for that proof you were talking about. Oh, wait. There is none? That's sad to hear.
2-fingered salute? Is Eurogamer referencing the Su-Fi?