Out of 80 million people it could not possibly have just been a coincidence I guess. If there was going to be credit card abuse it would have been utterly rampant by now and it would dominate the news.
We've already verified that at least one person claiming that 100s of dollars was stolen from them was trolling a website.
1. You are doing precisely and exactly what the people who stole your information want you to do. The real criminals in this are the hackers and you are doing their bidding.
2. What length of time would have been 'acceptable' before they told us? You want to know 'day one'? I'm sorry if investigations in to a huge network containing tens of millions of users takes time but would it have really been so much better if they had released bits of information th...
Anonymous; See; Pretentious
expressive of affected, unwarranted, or exaggerated importance, worth, or stature
making demands on one's skill, ability, or means
making usually unjustified or excessive claims
Remember, it's about 'free speech', never mind their attacks against Gene Simmons for expressing his free speech, or their attack against a Tea Party website for their expression of free speech, or their attack against Amazon for expressing their free speech in the form of not wanting to help Wikileaks.
At this point this guy is just trolling to get more money sent to him by idiots. He's looking forward to another vacation in South America or who knows where else.
I can't believe anyone supports this tool now. Even at it's most innocent we have a guy spending HIS money on a lavish vacation while asking for YOUR money to pay his legal bills. If he had even one shred of integrity he would have called off vacation plans and put the money in his own damn legal defens...
Oh is the utterly ineffectual laughing stock still 'doing something'?
I haven't had any problem connecting at any time except for briefly on the first day they started this nonsense.
If they this is what Anon calls a 'success' then perhaps calling them a joke is giving them WAY too much credit.
So you're going to just confirm I was 100% correct?
Thought so, thanks for trying.
Free speech is free speech. You basically just said 'Why yes, they are hypocrites' if that's why they attacked him because he was...
Expressing his rights of free speech.
I could go on about what a tool you are for supporting terrorist nations like Lebanon but I'll save that for some other time.
"Although it seems that they have had little to zero effect on stopping or delaying the war with Sony they still keep showing up."
Sounds precisely like what is happening when Anonymous tries to take on Sony.
They've been a short term mild nuisance at best. These are not hackers. This is not an elite team of thousands of hackers. It's a bunch of random idiots 95% of which are completely clueless idiots.
Hahaha, people are still paying attention to these absolute jokes?
Attention Playstation Life: I will not visit your site ever again if you don't stop giving these children the attention they crave. I invite others to join me, but I guess it would be too much to ask to have them blacklisted from N4G.
Everything they 'took down' is now back online and working perfectly fine or will be.
Thanks for coming Anon, nobody is impressed.
Hahaha, what a bunch of losers. My god these people are such a an absolute joke. It's hilarious because they really think they're defending 'free speech'.
I guess it was 'free speech' when they attacked Gene Simmons website too. What did Gene Simmons try to suppress? What information was he not permitting to be shared? Oh wait, they did that because he... said something they didn't like.
Anon is so full of it that a thousand septi...
How to define the hacker group 'Anonymous'
pretentious: expressive of affected, unwarranted, or exaggerated importance, worth, or stature
This group has never actually accomplished anything other than being a pest you can't quite get rid of. They're technically a cyber terrorist organization but I wouldn't want to give them that much credit.
But do keep at it Anonymous because as I already said the only thing you're do...
Go right ahead hackers.
In the end you're going to do nothing but prove Sony was absolutely right about you and completely justified. You do not have the moral high ground. You do not have a noble cause. At best you are wasting your time on something stupid at worst you are doing nothing but empowering your 'enemy'.
This is nothing, and I mean nothing, except pirates trying to put lipstick on a pig named 'stealing'.
Doing so well that they're doing a 'bring your friend' offer this soon?
This game is going to fall in to absolute obscurity within a few months.
And Warcraft is still a much better game even if you have to pay to play it.
And Warcraft is a terrible game.
Find the most normal non-main female character in a game and stick with her. Nobody wants to have to deal with the trouble that follows the girls on that list.
Garret is not an assassin. Garret is a thief. There is a difference.
Maximum difficulty: 'You are a thief, not a murderer, you should be able to accomplish your task without killing anyone'
Can we have Cassandra Cain as DLC or would the best person to ever put on a point eared cape short of Bruce Wayne be too much to ask for?
People just don't understand.
Sony has to assume the worst. They have to say that each and every single solitary PSN account was compromised and that everyone needs to update their information. They also have to say that they can't 100% promise CC info wasn't taken.
Chances are that north of 99% of the people will see nothing come of this, but Sony can't just say 'Nothing bad will happen'... All it would take is one person getting scre...