Good lord, read the shit before posting.
People who have a WoW Pass (meaning you subscribed to one game), you will be able to have free access to another game. Those who don't get that pass will still be able to play the game for shelf price.
And...you would need to buy the license in some way to play the game (at least legally), so...you got the disagree because you asked a REALLY STUPID QUESTION!
Two things worry me about this:
1. EA! They are beginning to get that bad rep back, and I'm not sure why they WANT it back, but it seems like they do with their recent behavior. Let's hope this is the start of them stopping themselves from putting their heads back into their asses.
2. The NFL! The way they have been "protecting" EVERYTHING now, they might see this as setting a bad example about the league. I remember the whole thing about being able ...
But what's stopping this type of thing from happening in the future? Remember, the online pass method (which remember, spawned from them looking to cash in on our hate for Gamestop under the guise of "used game sales ruin everything for us", since we all KNOW devs will never see a penny of the revenue from the Online Pass) already has a black-eye on it because of it being there in the first place and of who's initiating it (those publishers who already have a bad rep of cons...
They'll both survive and give each other the competition that the two sorely need. TOR is nothing like Rift was, and by a more respected company in Bioware (sorry, Trion, but you fucked yourselves over when you started thinking that Rift was God's gift to the MMO genre).
So yeah, both succeed because TOR is well hyped and has a fanbase already from it being Star Wars, and WoW will continue to succeed because it's just too big to fail at this point (that and patch...
I don't know, but she's effin smokin!
I can get along with her, if you know what I mean!
1. Agreeing or disagreeing with someone about a game, saying you don't like a game, or whatever, isn't going to make you lose bubbles. It's saying stuff like what you said later on, about Sony jihads, that will. There's a stark difference. Yes, you can say that Forza is the better game (if it is to you, then great), but is the Sony jihad line and you calling conspiracy via personal attacks necessary to do that?
2. I didn't play GT4 because it felt like a t...
Wrong word to use there.
For piracy to occur, a copy of the media would have to change hands. In this case, it's not piracy because a new copy is being made (you're not deleting the copy the peer has made available in order to get your own). Infringement is a better term (though you then get into gray area about if the media is readily and reasonably available, among other things).
One of the comments on that page:
"+ kassatsu on September 29th, 2011 at 1:16 pm said:
Would rather be playing Chrono Cross. Yea I went there."
Got this response:
"+ Charles McCarter on September 29th, 2011 at 3:13 pm said:
Well, you might not have to wait that much longer…"
OH YEAH!!! Does that mean what I THINK it means?
It depends on what you want to play, and how you want to play them.
For instance, MMOs like WoW, and many FPSs seem to handle better on a PC because of things like keybindings and aiming. To some, aiming with a mouse is a lot better than aiming with a controller. Being someone that just got into PC gaming earlier this year, I can say they have a point. In most cases, you can actually do better with mouse and keyboard in terms of getting to things quicker. That doesn't mea...
It's harder than you think, because one person who won't buy a certain product for a certain reason is not enough to offset the people who just cannot hold to their beliefs, or those that are too fanboyish to know any better. To make an impact, you have to convince those that I outlined (that, as you know, would sell their sanity for a penny if it meant they were able to be such fanboys) to do so before you're able to do anything that people will notice.
You...do realize there's such things about follow-up stories about those you've already read that can give you additional/further info, right?
I agree that Jonah needs to grow up, but it's more than him that has been reporting about this issue. Yes, Jonah needs to be banned from the games industry for the crap he spews, but in this case, I think this is an issue about Sony's recent change to the TOS that deserve all the attention it can be given.
If it was anyone else drawing attention to this issue, I think it wouldn't be viewed as something given by someone who grinds their ax constantly, and would be ...
Jonah always has an ulterior, anti-Sony motive with whatever he puts out on his site. It seems he can do nothing else. He has no room to really say anything that's deemed creditable without us bringing that up. He's been known to be very anti-Sony and very unfair in his articles.
That being said, though, this section 15 is going to have a lot of issues and challenges, there's no doubt about that, and we cannot pretend that there won't be (and personally, the a...
The outrage is because it's not JUST about the pass in of itself, but rather WHO has opted to add this. It's people like EA, THQ and Activision that has decided to do that. Neither of those three publishers have a good rep of consumer goodwill. They are known for doing a lot to monopolize the gaming market, and saying and doing things that many feel are anti-productive (and we all know Acti's boss Bobby Kotick has been known for saying things that no normal corporate head would be...
You missed the whole point, then.
A policy like this is severely damaging for game companies that want more exposure to their game. Imagine if you had a game company, and you planned on releasing a game on both the PS3 and 360. Since the 360 has or had such a huge lead on the PS3 (I don't believe it has a huge lead anymore, though), and you're game would receive massive exposure if it were on the 360 and/or XBL, then you were denied by MS to have the game on the 360 b...
That's what I was thinking to. He never said that they were never going to make a sequel. He just said that there were no immediate plans and that the rumors that they were already making the sequel were false. It would be foolish to completely shut the door for a possible sequel seeing how successful the game was. But perhaps they're working on other games or something like that.
It wasn't the most perfect way to go about answering that question or squashing the ...
Just to correct you on one point, WoW is "free to play" up to your first level 20 character. It hasn't adopted a completely F2P model, and it never will, either.
What about PC gamers? Funny we forget that Skyrim is to be released on the PC (Steam and stuff) as well, and those gamers get screwed, as well. Wonder what THEY think, since they get screwed all the time.
And yeah, this is disheartening that MS is STILL trying this tactic. It doesn't work, and all this does is prevent them from building their first parties. Sony is way ahead of them in that front, and it seems as those MS doesn't care that they only got Halo and Gears...
Then how would you be able to effectively control all the characters in your party at that point while moving your character, without slowing down the pace of the game? The Gambit system made it so you didn't have that artificial difficulty hurting your brain.