If it was free to play only a couple characters would be playable for free or in rotation. So yeah no I wouldn't want that and would rather pay $60 for the console version to get the game and every future DLC map/character for free. And Blizzard will actually support the game.
I can't believe people actually want free to play.
"eagerly following"
Yep "eager" does not have any positive connotations at all...
As soon as someone makes up fake percentages I see their opinion as invalid since it's based on very irrational thought.
And yes this is even true if I agree with them. I got War of the Monsters on PS4 since I lost my physical copy somewhere in the past 12 years.
I thankful for my friends and family that have helped me out over the years and the wealth of games this holiday.
I had to really pick and choose a few titles to get because of lack of time to play them all but the holidays will hopefully give me some time to catch up when I'm not spending it with family or friends.
Normally I'd think he'd be trolling yet the friends list has been down at periods yesterday and today.
Proof Today: https://twitter.com/XboxSup...
Proof Yesterday: https://twitter.com/XboxSup...
I really don't get why what he said is funny. To me it sounds like the Nemesis system except for character attributes, and their relationship to the main player, which actually does sound interesting. It's not just a hidden friendliness percentage like in Dragon Age or Mass Effect.
I agree. One of the reasons I love Skyrim and Elder Scrolls games in general is because the side missions actually have fun little stories to them. Skyrim has fetch quests that seemed infinite but those are classified as "miscellaneous quests" and are almost hidden in the mission menu.
Dragon Age Inquisition was fun, and a good rpg overall, but the game climaxed at the end of the first act imo.
You realize reviewers get to play multiplayer games days or weeks early in lobbies with other reviewers right? That's why the multiplayer isn't broken to them since the servers aren't hit with everyone trying to play the game yet.
If anything you're just highlighting the idea that reviewers shouldn't get multiplayer games early anymore. I know Bungie did that with Destiny and the reviews actually gave a good representation of the game imo.
If Bungie feels the need to have lines saying characters don't have time to explain the story multiple times why should I give them the light of day to spend a second looking at their lore?
I play games to play games. If all their story in the game is "go there, find/press/activate that and kill that" that's their problem. I have the right to say how terrible it is. It's also the first game I've seen that blatantly flaunts the rule of 3 yet no one se...
It's also been in the game since launch. I took an in-game photo when it happened to me, over a year ago, because it was the first time I encountered a nude person in the game lol.
Proof: http://i.imgur.com/toezRvW....
@ifistbrowni
Cool I made a spelling mistake but this is n4g where you're treated like an idiot in a passive aggressive way if you do. And you can't edit after 20 minutes. It's NOT mandatory to buy skin and character packs since you can still play with everyone else who has bought the game, even those who buy the packs when you yourself don't.
You can play against DLC monsters and with people who have DLC characters even if you don't own th...
The price is ridiculous but every map they create post launch is free. So not buying any of the DLC, which reminds me of fighting game DLC with skins and new characters, still allows you to play with everyone else and doesn't alienate people who don't buy DLC. That's the only positive for me since this DLC is actually mandatory and not required like maps packs in certain games.
I'd honestly rather have Sony and MS use the money they get from their subscriptions to be used to beef up protection from DDOS attacks then for it to be used to get free games for us and other extra treats. I personally don't even have enough time to play the games I buy on my own. I'm guessing the majority of people wouldn't want this though.
I guess I got lucky and was able to downloaded all the Crash and Spyro games I got in the flash sale on my vita before they removed them.
After God of War Ascension, Gears of War Judgement and Batman Arkham Origins I think I'll pass. I'm not supporting this prequel fad going around anymore even if they're trying to be cute by calling it a pre-sequel.
Also, it sounds like GearBox isn't developing it either which is worrying considering their past "collaborations".
@Hicken
Yeah because falsely ruining someone's work reputation, even just for a few days, should be compared to being right about rumors on gaming consoles. You're trying to sound rational, and reasonable, yet you use made up generalizations and percentages.
Personally, I could care less about any of these "insiders" and whether people like, dislike or believe them. I've stopped paying attention to the rumours they present a long time ag...
If this is true I hope survivor mode is unlocked out of the gate. I don't know if I'd want to play it on normal or hard before playing it twice on survivor again.
There's just so many contest you guys are doing it's awesome.
If I win a large size GTAV shirt would be preferable. The other options would be a bugstar keychain and ifruit case if I win any of those categories.
You guys are having so many contests recently. It's awesome and I'm glad I've followed this site for years.
Okay sure but don't you see cross-play as an overall positive thing?