The thing about MW3 is that they ONLY show you set pieces. In Battlefield games, you create set pieces.
Nobody stole anything. London and Paris are two different places. Mw3 will have a smaller level though and BF3's Paris level will be HUGE. It won't matter anyway because you guys won't be buying the opposing game.
Why for mw3. I'm not saying not make stuff for cod, but turtle beach headsets would be perfect for BF3. The sound is way better in BF so why not?
I don't see the big deal. The screenshots weren't bad at all. We all knew it was in Alpha so if anyone decided not to buy bf3 after those screenshots is an idiot, firtly because we've all seen in game footage of the game and we know it will look amazing! Don't sue the guy, he's an idiot but his life (150k+) isn't worth it.
I have my copy but the game isn't as terrible as most people think. Yes it was hyped beyond anything, but the story was realistic and the only thing MP needed was a lower player count. Mission mode was fun though right!?
Lets wait till we hear more details, eh.
I want to know why they have to take down the site. the domain was theirs before Acti even planned MW3, so rightfully the domain should remain up. But, you know... The one with money wins.
Pre Alphas are for gameplay purposes, not graphics. You don't test game mechanics at full resolution anyway. And setting graphics detail was disabled.
MS, and Sony are not working together. The Sony-Microsoft vice versa domain was bought by them so no one confuses anyone to thinking they were working together by making a false site.
Yeah, I hope they aren't 4 hours long and have 2 multiplayer game modes. flashback to release of the first PS3 and Xbox 360 games.
Very good point. I've always loved ME's art style. Given, Mirror's edge was developed by a more-than-capable-developer DICE. But about my point, a LOT of games that use UE usually look the same (as though you can pick out what game run on UE). For example, Almost every recent UE game looks like Gears of War.
Also, ME runs on a modified UE2 engine, not 3.
I think Crytec will lead next gen development. Unreal looks amazing, but Crytecs engine is far superior in terms of effects and the amount of resources. Crytec has scale whille Unreal has detail. But in all honesty, UE2 graphics are usually muddy looking while Cryengine is sleek and clean. Don't agree? Prove me wrong.
EDIT: I'm not mad that I got disagrees but I want to know why you guys disagree.
That's a good thing, that way we will be comfortable using the interface then.
Enemy spotted Enemy spotted enemy spotted enemy spotted enemy spotted enemy spotted enemy spotted...
you guys want that back? Sometime i have to turn the sound off on BF2 because that gets SO annoying.
The guy who posted the "5 reasons to hate" was Raven_Nomad. He posted it as "thecrapgamer" which is his gamertag on both PSN and Xbox 360.
I hope EA changes their minds. I think DICE should move on to Mirror's Edge for a while, then come back with a 2142 remake. I'm not saying BF is getting old, but I don't want to see it become another mainstream shooter. They should treat BF like Rainbow Six, every release is at maximum quality.
I think I'm going to have to cancel my board meetings just to be able to read this.
But it was still in-game.
I would call this bullshit, but the author didn't tell us what they were playing it on. They just mentioned PS3 and PC. From what we've been hearing all along is that the game is amazing, so that should be enough.
Red Faction-beating destruction, done in a game as handsome as Killzone 3, running as smoothly as Modern Warfare. It's the final proof that Battlefield 3 is the shooter to beat this year - by some way. - CVG
They speak truth.