It's difficult to recommend at 1200 ms points? What kind of DLC is justifiable to him then? I bet he was the same one that told me to buy the halo map packs.
@gmwps3
I agree, I was watching my brother play it and every mission seemed like a Do it or the world blows up kind of mentality. All I heard was yelling lol. It seemed like they tried to cram every possible idea into the game but it didn't mesh well.
I like the car customizations. The gun-play also felt immensely better.
yesh.
notice how i said ALMOST. That would mean they are not crap.
We need casuals in order to keep order.
One man vs Tank. Tank should always win. Team Vs Tank, Team (If not dumb) should win.
Comparison pics would be nice.
I'm just glad I can play the game on my 360. They aren't bad at all but I hate when people compare them to the PC and say "Why can't it be like that" when in reality the graphics on console look better than almost every FPS.
Summary: Flank, cover, flank, cover. Anything Head-On is a guarantee loss.
I love how PC players spaz-out when something amazing happens. It's much better than when console players try to switch weapons.
INTENSE. I bet if this was the official trailer, BF3 would've sold a WHOLE LOT MORE. The only thing is that it was too revealing of the campaign.
I went to the supermarket and saw MW3 in the dairy isle. Coincidence?
A tank is not just for one person to take out. It's a team effort not one man vs a tank.
"I'm already pushing 100 hours myself and haven't even completed a single plot line yet!"
How the hell did you do that? Do you have any shouts unlocked because you have to do certain story quests just to get more of them. Also the only way (That I know) to fight dragons is to do a mission at Whiterun.
aesthetics are nice and all, but it really comes down to how well the plot and design is. For BF3, it was only mediocre, but the environments and everything helped to an extent.
Then in real life I'd close my eyes, how can i see little tiny dirt specks lol. Not to say it's bad and remove it, it's just funny.
I've always wondered: Why does a game get scores so low? We all KNOW Skyrim isn't a 5/10 so at least put a 8-9 and say that there are glaring bugs that may be patched in the future.
MOH was a 6/10 for me, I really liked how they did the SP, but the graphical flaws really brought down the game, and no to mention the lackluster MP, though enjoyable at times, suffered from bad hit detection, OP weapons, plagued snipers, and no incentive to level up.
In your opinion. What would make the price point justafiable.