Yeah that whole last level was great but the final decision part was pretty "meh" even though murdering one of your squad mates was a main part of the whole story.
I hope they gave the male Shepard some acting lessons...
BF3
Campaign: Average (It is not below average because it could have been a LOT worse, It was just stale and lacked originality, however, the voice acting was great and the level layouts and environments were impressive.)
Multiplayer: Amazing, but could have been much better (I see a lot of mis-opportunities in them multi right now; such as bugs, spawn points, map design, overall content, Co-Op length and variety, green flashes, tac lights, needs more balanc...
Yeah, that's all anyone's playing on BF2 right now. That, Karkand, Jalalabad, and Wake Island. I want another Jalalabad. It'd be great to go from the desert, through the city center, then to the mosque in a Rush game!
lol I have yet to play it. From what I've seen, It looks confusing as hell.
It batter be good. The last C&C game I bought was Red Alert 3, I heard C&C4 was complete garbage which was a shame because the story looked interesting from the trailers.
Quick heads up, The second pic under Sharqi Peninsula is really Mashtuur City.
It doesnt deserve a 5. about a 7 to 8. it only warrants a purchase if you want more of the same.
Yeah, i hate only seeing only what my friends unlocked. what they really need is a platoon manager right in the game so i dont have to open a browser to check it. they also need tournament hosted servers so platoons can organize matches and battle it out without interruptions of it being a public server. so much potential, DICE just needs to find it.
I want to see what Respawn Entertainment and Danger Close has cooked up.
They need to take off the crosshairs and map on hardcore, idk why they didn't.
How do people disagree when I say I'm not experiencing lag? Are they looking at my connection and saying I'm lying?
No lag here.
Notch is synonymous with mine craft. I wonder how long it'll last before people start to shift away from it and on to the next mojang game.
This has nothing to do with what call of duty does. I could care less. This is about the DLC in general. I'd never buy a $15 map pack. I'd buy b2k because it's more than a map pack, but compared to bfbc2 Vietnam or bf2 Special Forces, it just SEEMS like 4 new maps, not as drastic a change as previous expansions. That's all. IM NOT SAYING $15 IS TOO MUCH, I'm saying in regards to previous expansions it doesn't LOOK like $15 but the contents (weapons, achievements, vehic...
Dont forget forgotten hope!
As i said, i like the fact that its only 15. But in reference to past $15 DLC, which varied in eras, the 15 in B2K is only justified in the extra weapons and vehicles. Whereas if it was just a map pack, which many ill-informed gamers see it as, it wouldnt be worth the price.
Im getting it for free, but i dont think i %100 agree on it's $15 price point. It should be $10 imo because unlike bf1943 and bfbc2: vietnam, it doesnt really look like a standalone expansion like the others. In no way am i saying b2k isnt worth it, it's just at face value it looks like a $10 DLC. No major objections though, i know other devs that would bump it up to $20 easy.
More time = better quality.
More often than not, but not always. Take Too Human for example or Duke Nukem. Usually a 2-3 year cycle is best for franchises.
I preferred the one hit kill from bfbc2 but I'm a little undecided on the bf3 sniper rifles.