words do matter, but which games from that list is a remake, remaster or port in your opinion.
just want to see what you think and how you define what is what.
the games industry really needs to start using the same words. we really need to know what counts as a remake/remaster/port.
out of those 5 games:
re hd remaster is a remaster of a remake
zelda seems like a remaster, cant be hundred % sure though since i havent played it.
its quite hard to define what they go under since there is so many grey areas.
agreed, but surprised about how many agrees and no disagrees you got. probably because sony fanboys just want to agree.
if this game isnt as as hard as the others then i may consider this game. like you, i didnt play souls games because of the difficulty. havent tried it myself but many hardcore players find it hard.
dont get me wrong i dont like playing easy games like ass creed or batman. i just dont like playing games that are way too hard for me to have t...
as i said in my comment. nintendo has brilliant games, its just a shame that if you play more games a year then nintendo releases a year then you would have to buy 3rd party games if there are any or buy another console.
i personally like 3rd party games and probably play as many as i do with sony exclusives.
@jcnba28
quality>quantity is definitely true. i love nintendo games especially mario kart series and my most favourite mario64. however we ar...
nintendo comes out with brilliant games almost everytime. however i do like my 3rd party/multiplats games and i think nintendo didnt push devs enough to portgames on their console.
2014 was still a strong year for last gen and sadly wiiU didnt really get many of those ports.
looks pretty cool for a companion app. i wonder if we need the actual game to play this on vita?
@abriael
thanks for info.
time to get out my 8gb memory card and attach that to my japanese card. probably a good time to check out pso2 aswell.
sega needs to start releasing their games outside japan.
considering that they had to upres the gc backgrounds i think they did a pretty good job. they probably could have done a lot more on the actual character models though.
maybe if they do decide to remake re2 with static. ackgrounds they would be able to push character models to the next level.
i aould like to disagree. it was probably the gamecube that killed the franchise. remake was highly praised but not many people actually played the game.
re0 was highly anticipated but the game sales just didnt match at all, no one seemed to care about the game and it got lots of mixed opinions.
re4 revolutionised everything, gc sales were ok.
my personal list of the re games i have played and co pleted.
1. re2
2. re1
3. re code veronica X
4. nemesis
5, re5
6. re4
seems like i am missing something, but i cant seem to think of it right now. i guess it qould be lower since i dont remember the games right now.
picked 4 behind 5 because my personal experience with 5 was co-op which made the game alightly more enjoyable and i knew that i would be ...
think consumers care about the rating a little too much
i meant game reviews. not metacritic.
im just saying that its the people who pays bonuses based on metacritic are doing it wrong.
i hate metacritic because everyones scale is different, 5/5 does not mean 10/10.
an 8.5 on one site can also be very different to an 8.5 on another site. metacritic is useless but the people basing bonuses on that is a lot worst.
loved snake and otacon. they had brilliant codec conversations, especially in mgs2.
peace walker had huey and big boss but that relationship felt really cheap.
after the second sniper wolf battle the next section of the game requires a dis change in the original mgs.
at the same point in mgs4, there was a joke about switching discs and bluray being big enough to hold the data.
switching controller was when you fought with that psychic boss with the 2 dolls. was it screaming mantis? if i remember correctly, if you switch controller there would be a codec call joking about how you cant move and needing to use controll...
its not really metacritics fault. its whoever that gives the employees their bonuses.
game sales/profit should be considered. review scores also gives a good idea of how the public enjoyed the game.
whats more important for the devs? making a game that people enjoyed greatly or making a game that had more sales and brought in more money?
ffxiii demo was very short if i could remember correctly. not expecting much differencein length.
or it could be ffviii style demo, that was pretty i think.
im expecting late 2015/early 2016 for japan. maybe a 2 mnth wait for others.
didnt they say the demo size was similar to ffxiii demo?
they could easily make that game look better. just make it as detailed as the animation. the 3d models had a lot less detail.
not saying it didnt look nice, just saying it could be improved a lot.
story was ok, but very unlike the other ff storylines where there is a clear villian.
i just want the game for vita/ps4. international zodiac version would be interesting to play but i hope that the original glitches(?) are still there.
i had more fun breaking the game then playing the game properly.
would also be cool if they added dual wielding. would make some rare weapons actually useful.
its a great and exciting idea. illumiroom never made much sense to me.
concept is still super early and i want to know how the images are projected onto the lens.
the lens also seem to be very close to our eyes, how will they handle doublevision.
the size of that hmd seems a little unrealistic aswell, the things it needs for it is a kinect and a display for the lens.