Awesome, definitely a Day 303 purchase for me....at $20 on sale during the holiday season.
FU EA and your CE only day 1 DLC.
It's a veiled attempt to raise the price of new games above $60.
I loved the gunplay in RDR so this should be significantly better in the gunplay department. For me, a day 1.
Well PS4 and NextBox are coming out in the next 2 years most likely so Apple is a little late to the game.
Those speeds are pretty bad, Sony should release better cards.
A PC dedicated entirely to gaming would require less hardware power to produce similar results because devs can optimize it.
I hope they allow you to upgrade the RAM like in a mac, which is a very closed hardware system too.
@ reynod
If you have a bunch of PS3 games, I'm assuming you have a PS3 too....just keep that and problem solved.
I still have my PS1 and PS2 (and their boxes) because I'm not giving away my system that I paid 300-400 dollars for to EB Games for $40. I rather just keep it, and if they're worth so little I rather just treat it like a collectors item.
Who knows, in 20 years you may be able to sell the entire Playstation family o...
Despite buying both previous ME games day one for $60, I'll buy ME3 on sale for $20 at during the holiday season.
This practice is getting out of hand. Give the CE edition people a cool art/story book or action figures, not significant in game content.
No wonder EA loses money every year.
I bought ME1 and ME2 day one for $60 (plus tax), ME3 I'll buy for $20 this holiday season on sale or preferably from some guy on craigslist.
FU EA.
I'd take Rayman and the console version of BF3 off that list and add Uncharted 2 and Gears 2 as well.
Also Crysis 2 had that whole film grain problem on 360 which EA acknowledged but never spent the money to fix (assholes).
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Some people are just too good at games. WOW.
Battlefield will be the king of military MP next-gen imo.
Like with Move, if Sony doesn't motivate developers ($$$) to utilize Vita in multiplats devs will ignore it.
I'm pretty sure MS pays extra to have extra Kinect features in multiplats, it does cost time and money to program 'extra' features in.
Me too, it sounds really cool that 343 really wants to make the player feel like they're in an insanely expensive mech armor.
I'd love to see if Halo is as good as when Bungie made it. I love the franchise (Reach is one of my favs of the gen along with MGS4) but I'm not confident it will still have that special something that keeps me coming back to it.
Halo is not a game where you can just copy and paste from one version to the next like COD. The gameplay is already a bit dated so 343 will have to make some progressions while appealing to existing fans and that's something that requir...
Americans kill a lot of peoples' loved one too with accidental missile strikes. In fact, no country is involved in as many wars as the United States so America is probably killing more loved ones than any other country.
To be fair, almost all military FPS games allow you to shoot American service men (COD, BF for example).
Someone has to be the opposing team. The real question is why is it worse shooting Americans than other peoples.
Is it just me or are did the BF3 ones seem more impressive. The COD ones were cool to watch but seemed like luck or stupidity was at play more than skill.
Im my experience, everything MS controls costs more than it competitors offering the exact same thing.
Apple dominated well with 'i'
Nintendo dominated with 'we'
It makes sense to use 'you'
Not as much as not having anything to do but play outside with other kids does.
The problem is the gameplay isn't fun enough to keep coming back despite knowing everything about the story. You need to feel challenge and gradual skill improvement without any cheapness.