But if you played the games seperately, could you honestly tell a difference?
Been happening to me aswell!
People are just big fans and want to see other people share their passion I guess.
This has been long overdue for Sony, and while they have a ton of work left to do, it's nice to see them back as true contenders now.
Awesome job SCE.
It's not meant to offend or be a knock at any game in particular. It's an individual commentary about the "Hard" difficulties in games, that's all.
More a "story" than a "critique" if you will.
It's probably either something like Qore or a rental service.
Maybe you pay £20 a month and are able to download up to three-PSN titles at a time at no extra cost. When you're done with them you can download another three. Etc?
Something like that.
I doubt Sony will make people pay to play online. Free online is such a huge advantage for them.
I think you have a bit of a point. What would be nice is if respected editors, or even MM staff, were able to create like "Playlists" of other author's levels they'd like to recommend to the community.
There has to be a way from them to implement a "Play Awesome Levels" button, that's constantly up to date with well recommended levels that you haven't played before.
Indeed we do. I'd put Uncharted 2 in second place but, if you have them different, that's not a problem.
Oh the irony.
Nolan says in the interview that he'll definitely audition for the part, but he comes across like he doesn't expect to get it, mainly because of higher profile names.
I think Jackman would be a good choice actually. I hadn't considered it before this, but I think if they're not going to have Nolan, then Jackman suits the looks and the type of character.
He's also pretty darn high profile so it would bring the movie sky-high in terms of profit potential. Which is cynical, but like Nolan says in the interview, it's how the medium works right?
You're too busy arguing instead of thinking. Ask yourself what games sell best on Playstation? LittleBigPlanet aside, you're looking at mainly games aimed at 15-35 year old males, GENERALLY.
Treading the path of Eye Pet as opposed to game that typically pleases the current fanbase is a risk -- but if you'd have actually read the article you might have seen how the author goes on to explain how that risk could be used to expand the Playstation's audience.
You're entit...
It's a risk as a product in my opinion. It's a game not necessarily in tune with the current PS3 audience.
The article is far from Sony bashing though. It's actually a really positive piece, and I reviewed the game for PushSquare (didn't write this article) giving it 4/4.
Haha, I've explained it before on here but just for the record -- for us 4 is all the scale you need: you have bad, ok, good, very good. On a five point scale you have: very bad, bad, ok, good, very good. We asked ourselves developing the site, is that "very bad" point really necessary? So we stuck to 4.
Hope that helps :)
Certainly one of the greatest of all time. I'd put it somewhere in the Top 20 for definite.
This and Super Mario Galaxy are up there for my favourite of the generation, personally speaking.
Seems like that's been the case already!
No hint of a macho complex over at PushSquare. We always review our games for their core audience -- but having said that, I genuinely believe anyone will enjoy Eye Pet. And at £17.99 -- a smidgeon more than Trine -- it'll last longer and serve as an excellent technical set piece.
I hope people give it a chance.
You can yes, it's £17.99 without and £30 with -- so still an awesome price either way depending on what you choose. I think some reviews have been needlessly harsh and forgotten the price/audience.
Yes, that is extremely disappointing. It might be the publishers fault however. They might have pulled it to work on kinks.
That doesn't make sense. You want one, but Sony aren't giving you a reason to want one?
If that's a compliment (which I think it is) I'll pass it on. Either way, Twiggy loves hearing from folks.