I loved Dark City! Neo-noire...that's about right too.
I'm still to make my mind up based on what the game turns out to really be. But it seems interesting for sure.
If I was in their shoes I wouldn't bother with the DLC and just worry about ME3, lol. DLC is to make extra money, so they should probably put some decent effort in...
I guess they are too busy thinking about the third game? This might be the problem with releasing a sequel so soon?
Not me..but looks good.
When I've finished single player I consider it 'finished'. However I may still play it and finish side quests or do the multi. Generally I like to play 1 game at a time, so that's why I classify finished this way.
There often was more of a multi focus I think with these games, but this one looks to have a decent single player as well.
I totally agree with you.
Why not release separate single and multiplayer games to satisfy those who want one but not the other and devote enough attention to each, instead of dividing their attention on both!
I've heard the multi is better than the single player. I'm glad it's not another 'russia/middle east' terrorist hunt clone, but since my 'home' isn't USA, it kinda loses the intensity of home is where the war is....
I'm getting over shooters these days though...a bit too samey.
I personally dislike Horatio. Actually I dislike CSI, but my wife loves it.
I remember some reviewer once called it porn violence or something like that because the victims are almost always young women killed violently.
And all the montages set to music to pad out the show....sigh.
I really hope LA Noire is good, but it's a bit of a mystery as to how it plays. Hopefully something a bit different and fun.
Yeah but whatever happened to the next Half Life?
I sure hope the next Thief is coming soon...I really enjoyed the last one.
This is my problem as well. The only real RPG I've played to this day is Oblivion, and that was because there were so few games out at the time (well and because it was brilliant).
I've only watched a bit of it but it did look more like a hack n slash with talking in between. Looked fun.
This game sounds like a great game for the kids, but it is rated M here in OZ...I wonder why?
@ Astoroth
One guy makes the point that war games have to depict war zones and that they may be 'realistic' but that they aren't 'beautiful'.
He also suggests the way around those limitations is to have beautiful environments that gets destroyed during the battles instead of just a pre-destroyed place.
But I think the point is: is 'more realistic' the same as 'beautiful'
One of them uses Flower as one of his examples of 'beauty' too.
I actually like the idea of an environment that starts off all stunning, like say the Gears 1 game, which you then can destroy and make into something that is not!
And I don't mean cut and paste buildings that all fall apart the same way...
The tranformation ...
Hmmm it looks to me like one guy is saying Killzone 3 is beautiful and the other is saying it isn't...
Which side?
Both really. I can see both sides.
Episode 3? Is there even one anymore???? They are spending WAY too much time on teasing people who 'need' to solve things!!!