CRank: 5Score: 28870

Well his "revival" of the franchise sucked out loud, so not sure what he expects.

1635d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sh... Sheamus?

1639d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Had a tetanus booster in December, so no.

1639d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

And I thought potential FDA approval of the Pfizer vaccine would be the dumbest thing I read all day...

1639d ago 8 agree17 disagreeView comment

Whew. For a second there I thought the zombies were racists too. That's a load off my mind.

1641d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

As long as she does that super cool wink, says badass stuff like "Heh, sup?", and lands in that super awesome side-squat pose in every single cutscene like a TOTAL BADASS~! then it should be fine. /s

Also looking forward to the male Tomb Raider reboot, and no, Nathan Drake does not count because reasons.

1641d ago 13 agree1 disagreeView comment

Does it still pair you with Martin and his Solrock every f'ing match?

1642d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The CDC has entered the chat

1643d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

People are allowed to have different opinions about games, and that "agree or else" mentality needs to die. I loved Ghost personally, solid 9/10 for me and what I enjoy, but I can see why somebody would ding it. It got pretty repetitive in parts.

1643d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

The fact that people downvoted you explains EVERYTHING about this site. Pachter's only claim to fame is popping up periodically to be startlingly wrong about things.

1643d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Pachter said 2023? Support through 2035 confirmed.

1643d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ground-up remakes of those games would be killer

1643d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Same. 3/5, 7/10 max and that's being pretty generous.

1644d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Since you keep missing the point, he gave it a 1/5. Personally I'd give it a 3/5, and I'd consider a 5/5 to be totally ridiculous... yet many outlets gave it just that with absolutely no justification other than "shiny new fuzzy things so pretty". The story sucked. The worlds were bland. The gadgets were lame. The sub-bosses were all copypasta. There's a myriad of reasons to ding the game especially for those of us that are longtime RaC fans.

So why is...

1644d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

The vast majority of people on this board admit to either having never played the game or this being one of their first Ratchet games. They have no barometer for what a good RaC game is, and that's why they're willing to praise such blatant mediocrity.

...that and it's shiny with fuzzy characters.

1645d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

...and how does a 1 being different from a 7 change anything I said? People have massively overinflated scores for this game. A couple scores on the low end and it's freakout time.

1645d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

There's no way anybody can justifiably give it above a 7/10 either but that hasn't stopped people.

1645d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Ban people that disagree with the status quo? Good god.

"Agree with the masses OR ELSE." A lot of us older Ratchet fans didn't like the game. Our opinions are just as valid as yours even if you're too fragile to hear them.

1645d ago 12 agree10 disagreeView comment

Agreed 100% (with the blurb at least) and been saying it since the game came out. Soulless, uncreative, no replayability, and mediocre beyond words; this is one of the worst Ratchet games ever.

1645d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment

Yep. Pretty much stopped playing altogether when I realized they did that. Dumb move.

1646d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment