yep but these kinda policies aren't good for the consumer. one thing I didn't like about this gen is that the games always try to go for parity = gimped pc games, possibly ps3 too
Install base for other platforms is big enough that they don't really need to make for ps3, pc, and xbox but since microsoft don't make games and relies totally on 3rd party if a few jump ship it could
Well you do need a good internet connection to play online and if you're short of ram it's really cheap right now.
http://www.newegg.com/Produ...
I think i saw some for like $15 for 2gig stick
well 64 players is THE reason. 12vs12 w 4 tanks and 4 jets leaves like 2 or 3 infantry per side.
anything over 40 should be good.
i heard the 6970 does better with dx11
well it would never happen any because you can't even open your console without voiding your warranty. it's better to just pay for free services and ridiculous markups on proprietary accessories right?
I wouldn't say it competed with a 480. (had 2) replaced with 480. I think it was around the 280,275 gtx. Its just a oc'd 4870 which is a great card that was available cheap. Made Nvidia drop prices real quick and come out with an updated 260
It's a nice try, but gameplay looks a little oversimplified.
It's a pretty good game. The one complaint I have is that the end felt rushed and it's only 3 chapters+prologue. But the first two chapters are long.
I liked mass effect 2 better. The only thing I liked better about gameplay in Mass Effect was that your powers had separate cool down but everything else about 2 played better. The original Mass Effect had a better story but gameplay was just average. But I agree that planet scanning was weak.
gg
I think the main problem with kinect is that it's very limited with what you can do. It's good for some niche games(dance games?) but it doesn't seem to work well with normal games. It's been at ms last 3 E3 shows so you have an idea of what's being developed for it. It's only been out 6 months?, and already another dance central? Is there a reason that kinect games look like a major downgrade graphically or is it just me
yeah in ff x-2 tidus comes back at the end so maybe
This would be the beginning of the end of quality gaming, as the leading/most popular company would never have to innovate or improve gaming. Developers would have almost zero incentive to produce quality titles due to a lack of competition, whereas all they'd have to worry about is spreading out their release dates far enough from pre-established big titles like Halo, Forza, Modern Warfare, Gears, etc. and they'd sell decent if there is nothing new coming out that month.
here's some links for software sales. these are a little old so the 360 had a bigger lead then (supposedly)
http://www.destructoid.com/...
http://www.psuni.com/ps3-so...
"You cannot get Crysis as it is on PC on any console. What you would have to do is compromise the design and the level design..." - Cevat Yerli
maybe people are upset because crytek have been demoing cryengine 3 with dx11 since 2009 so people kinda expected the game to be dx11. I don't care all that much I just wont buy the game but you can't blame people for being disappointed in the(PC)game.
I thought Intel already did that. Even though Intel graphics suck. Intel's manufacturing is like the most advanced of the chipmakers
Not disagreeing with you but the unreal series was basically multi-player only except unreal2 i think. So what OTHER single player games are you talking about?