Gears had a major downgrade in physics. The bullet holes were like some paint effect that dissapears in 3 seconds, and didn't really affect anything. It's like gears of airsoft.
vision gran turismo program was started in 2013, the cars were free downloads for gt6 and gt sport.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...
Valve index, but it's expensive
How do you play gears on a phone? Is it with that controller attachment?
"Yet here in reality only MS and Xbox have been dropping megaton news and delivered on them this entire generation while over at the Sony and PlayStation camp you just hear a constant flatlining beep with the occasional tumbleweed rolling by as their "huge" announcement. "
Is this a joke?
Microsoft studios should be pushing all those new directx features. If Microsoft's own developers don't use them why would 3rd party devs bother with it?
Stadia (and other game streaming) will be a dud. Google does have android, which is the most used OS in the world.
"Thank Microsoft for a $400 PS4 that developers like to make games on"
Xbox zealots have become totally delusional.(not really new) It's thanks to Microsoft that sony came out with a $400 ps4, even though XBOX was $100 more and weaker hardware. Right sure buddy. It's thanks to Microsoft that developers like ps4, it has nothing to with them talking to developers and getting feedback. Even though XBOX launched with wack ass xram512mb that was a bottleneck.
Every console game has drm. xbox live and psn are forms of drm. It's the intrusive drm that people don't like. Which is one of the reasons many pc gamers avoid microsoft. They had sh!tty pc drm unlike steam which is liked by all, but also drm.
They won't. If they feel like their game can sell I don't see them putting it on gamepass day1. Maybe for their own sub service they would. The only reason xbox is doing this is because they released several flops in a row and xbox live was a ghost town.
I'm pretty sure whatever timed deal you are talking about wasn't said to be coming to all platforms than announced to be exclusive after advertising on xbox.
@nitus10
Father Gascoigne is the first boss, why would you want to start over after beating him? You probably wont do much upgrading by the time you get to him.
Well microsoft would most likely add some kinda microtransactions to the game which could effect the overall quality. Private Division obviously didn't do that with outer worlds. It's not hatred of microsoft, it's just looking at their history and using common sense. Do you think it's the devs that want to monetize everything in games? Remember microsoft is the one pushing gaas the most and want to monetize every aspect of gaming.
It's the end of the generation though. XBOX Scarlett will be out before they even finish their payments.
In the 90's there was satellite tv, which worked fine. Since music is less data than video and high speed internet is way faster than satellite, they didn't really have much of a lag problem. Streaming might work for simple games but now people are talking about 4k 60fps, raytracing, etc. These "streaming is the future" articles seem like paid ads to me. How is streaming going to "change your game" besides taking away ownership?
I think the companies that are investing lots of money into this are the ones that will be disappointed.
I think game streaming will fail. The hardware isn't really that expensive to buy and games go on sale all the time. Streaming seems like it will end up costing the consumer more money (over time) but giving an inferior experience. What about games like GTA that have blockbuster launches? Are these companies going to buy super computers to stream to millions of gamers or will there be a waiting queue just to play the game.
ubisoft is starting their own subscription service also
I liked being the boss monk in the tower. You actually got a boss life bar lol
I don't think it will be the standard in the future. Hardware isn't all that expensive right now and will get cheaper in the future but network stuff will always have lag.