no
How the fuck would you know if the picture says anything unless it's already been spoiled for you.. nice joke
Keep aged, crappy controls and nuances to make it harder? what...? They can just make it harder some other way.
Oof. Performance should be really bad to take this gem down to a 5, and it is pretty bad according to review. Worse than 360? Come on.. horrible port. Switch is pretty weak, but should outperform the 360. I guess PS4/5 Xbox1/XS could brute force through a lot of poor optimizations, though.
Holy shit....... what
Also, not saying I didn't love it. But It's such a drastic change from RE1-3. I think more acclaimed for it design than its horror elements. I was never scared/anxious like being on my last legs of ammo and health/herbs too long after a save in RE1-3 and seeing a tough enemy or pack of zombies knowing it's the only path to progress.
RE1-3 were more full blown survival horror than RE4. Enemies drop ammo. Scores, collectibles, merchant?
Dead Space took from more from the controls/camera/animation/feel .
COD had kb/m support for years, but definitely more likely to get controller users.
Great game, but I felt is was the first sign of them straying from a full survival horror, to more arcade-like style horror, the next 2 games show the transition.
Depends, idk if it's my C7 OLED, or bad optimizations/frame-pacing but some games just don't look good at 30fps. Spiderman: MM played GREAT at 30fps(at least I think it wasn't 40fps, never changed a thing since I got it pre-40fps patch, C7 doesn't have VRR), and actually Rift Apart was more noticeable at 30fps than MM. Dying Light 2 was unplayable af to me at 30fps, and so was HFW and Ghost Wire Tokyo. Demon's Souls was pretty good at 30fps for sure. Few other games I can...
well they could have design some propriety small card key for physical licensing, or modify the USB a bit. Make the packaging 5x smaller and the disc just the key, so like as small as UMD.
Depends on the games, I sure some have the data on the disc, COD is a bad example because they feel it's okay for it to tak 200+ GB, why even bother putting it on the disc, they're thinking. Sure some sub 50-100gb games put data on the disc, but you still get months of patches, because most games are incomplete on release.
Another problem is they release major games, and immediately need a Day 1 patch, even if all the data is on the disc.
People who play for the campaign. Who buys a $70 game, and has no internet connection, and only plays the singleplayer? Would be a better question. But sad truth is there are still some people who don't have access to fast or reliable internet service, and they have money to pay for it.
Idk about $35 a year later. Maybe 20-25, and definitely not 2 years later(according to ebay, which also has sellers fees, S&H tacked on to the price, likely)... Also finding a buyer that will pay that. I'd still prefer disc, though because even getting $20 a year later is nice. Can only recall buying COD:MW on sale on Christmas 2019. Don't think I'd ever pay $70 for a COD. Will be renting this one.
@Storm23
No you're right, it is up there for length in survival horrors. Could be judging based on my consecutive playthroughs, but I'd also consider non-exploited speedruns, and consider the nuances of controls, forced qtes and sequences etc of that era that didn't age well. RE4 was funner, RE3 felt more like a survival horror, RE4 was more arcade-ish.
I rented RE2 Remake, and bought RE3 Remake for under $20, while I was done with it after my first playthrough, I could squeeze a few more dollars out of it like time based stuff, trophies.
So he knew what he was doing? While they probably made RE3 Remake shorter than the original, it's obviously going to be shorter on consecutive playthroughs. RE4 Remake looks like it could try to be 1:1 with the original. And the original wasn't long. For RE3 Remake you can even say it's faster due to QoL changes, controls, etc.
I call BS on your first run being "a little over" 2 hours unless you knew what you were doing. A lot of games can be made short if you've played them before and know exactly what to not do.
Personally, I don't get this spoiler culture, it seems the people most hurt by it are also the first to say something on a spoiler post. Spoilers have not ruined any game for me, or movie, tbh. I enjoy the narrative, actually a spoiler sometimes makes it more interesting. Snowflakes literally staying away from images, because it will ruin the whole game for them, and they're very vocal about it.