Awesome. Great that studios reach out to these gamers and really try to improve accessibility, well deserved award, as if they were even going for that.
RE1 and RE:CV first.
This is a news site, dude, you're plugging your YouTube channel. There is no difference from this opening segment than from the Day 1 patch. It's not a new map or discovery. Not bashing your content on YouTube, but I question the motives of posting it here, when the game has been out for almost a month.. You saw an opportunity, is all I'm getting.
This is borderline spam. The game is nearly a month old, if someone cared to see the first 10 mins of gameplay, they could look on YouTube.
Are bots approving this shit and reporting people for criticism?
RE7&8 were refreshing after the sorry excuse for survival horror that was RE5&6. You're biased because of first-person, story gets pretty disconnected and convoluted with RE4...
Agreed I guess?
RE4 was showing some arcadiness and less horror feel than the previous games, they went even harder with that on 5 and 6. RE4 was amazing, but I don't think it was on the same level of survival horror as the originals, sorry.
That would be smart, S Mart.
Predator, Evil Dead, Friday the 13th, Ghost Busters, others, that could have a great single player adaptation turn out to be multiplayer games like this. Not my genre, so disappointing for me.
Can't believe this game is still kinda a master piece 14 years later. It took from RE4, but it did the horror better. And both are getting remakes, sweet.
Was watching some gameplay, games look like a blast. Don't think you have to even have heard of Die Hard to enjoy them. I mean, what's being a fan going to help besides the initial purchase.. movie games hardly have much correlation to the source material, design choices are usually all over the place.
Yes, it's so obvious. If you didn't know it was from one of the major people from Dead Space, you'd even say it's a blatant knockoff or a bad spiritual successor. I'm sure it didn't turn out the way they wanted critically, but I think they might have been missing some key people from the original other than Glen Schofield.
I think if they tried, they could match at least the base PS4, power wise.
It should be.
It's a huge ask, they don't make generational leaps. I mean the Switch is barely more powerful than the Wii U and I would even say the jump from GameCube/Wii to Switch was more like a generation. Next console being in the ballpark of a PS5 would be a huge ask, seeing as it be like jumping 2 generations in terms of power.
Same here, personally. I had just got EA Play 1 year before they gave out Mass Effect: Legendary, that, BF2042, and JFO and maybe a couple others are what justified it for me, and of course possibly games in the future. Fallout 76 is already on the Extra list.. isn't it? So this is purely for locking it in for essential. Axiom Verge 2 is the only game that interests me in this case.
Yeah. Well it has to be developed around the boost is what I was saying. Assuming they aren't lifting the clocks for the system so all games you have will have less performance dips, unpatched.
Games that had frame dips under cap benefitted slightly from the PS4 pro boost too. 7 percent is pretty big for 90hz/fps.. depending if it's CPU or GPU bottlenecked.
So this is only for developers taking advantage of it going forward, only? Patches too I guess. Wonder if there'll be some sort of boost (mode) for older games.
Nothing alike, have you played them both? I made this comparison after having played Sifu not to long after Deathloop and it just stuck with me, I guess because it's the first time I played a game like Deathloop. What genre is it? Almost seems roguelitish but without random generated levels and arcadiness.
If not for just simply calling them both Roguelites so no comparison has to be drawn. The major differences being one is a fighting game and the other a FPS/RPG, and...
He hardly counts, they say because he was designed to be a mascot, it's unfair, and forced. Does it even have a personality or story?