Sony's advantage over MS was announcing stuff for the PSP and they had Kevin Butler. Take those away and their conference wasn't that great, Both Move and Kinect weren't that interesting, they both announced exclusive deals with multiplats, they both showed some of their high profile exclusives, they both announced one new IP and they both had developers from opposite camps (Hideo for MS and Gabe for Sony).
Sony's show was a bit better than MS's because th...
Sony's conf. was alright, only the last 20 minutes were interesting because of their exclusive line up. They could of saved so much time by not focusing so much on Move and Multiplat videos that were already shown. Ninty IMO won it.
Nope sorry, Sony didn't own from start to finish. Out of the entire hour and a half, the last 20 minutes were exciting and maybe some PSP announcements. Move didn't excite me at all and they put so much time into that. Don't get me wrong though Natal wasn't that great either. Jack Tretton talked way too much and they focused so much time on multiplats by showing videos of a game we've already seen before.
It WAS better than MS's I'll give you that,...
The Xbox has better Wifi, but what keeps the PS3 slim being better than the Xbox slim is the Blu-ray drive, that is all.
I must be the only one who wasn't impressed with Sony's conference. I feel a lot of people are just giving too much credit. Don't get me wrong, it was better than MS's conference, but I think Nintendo took it this time.
They spent too much time on Move, Jack Tretton was talking way too much and they showed us things that were already shown before. The only reason Sony's was better than MS's was because of Kevin Butler and the PSP announcements. When i...
I actually found Sony's conference disappointing, Nintendo had the best one. What saved Sony from being as bad as MS was Kevin Butler and the fact it has a PSP lineup.
- Most of Sony's conference consisted of Move and too many Multiplatform games. I mean, why show the game again if it was already shown at the EA conference?
- They've only shown like 3 of their top exclusives and one new IP, much like MS did, which was like the last 20 minutes of ...
I clearly didn't play KZ2? I beat KZ2 and yes, while there are vehicles, they were only restricted for the campaign. Even then, they were just joy ride sequences. Where are the vehicles in MP? The SP was also very linear.
I'm not saying the game looks bad, in fact it looks amazing. It's just that it's obvious Halo does things different than KZ. Some people will just look at the ground and the gun and say that halo looks shit compared to KZ2.
I don't remember KZ2 having vehicles, skyboxes, humongous scale of details and more AI.
the KZ engine has been in development for how long now? 7 years? Halo Reach has only been what...3 years? It at least looks a bit better than KZ2.
As someone who loves Xbox 360 games, this was a terrible conference, I honestly thought MS was going to keep things interesting the entire time, but nope. I honestly thought the Kinect show was going to be at a seperate time and it was going to be about games and other huge announcement like the new design. I wouldn't be surprised if the entire place was bored.
Negatives from the MS conference...
- They have spent WWWAAAAYYYY too much time on Kinect and i...
Oops, wrong reply
Ok seriously I thought Natal was supposed to have its own conference, it started out with a bang and now it's getting boring, I want to see games!
So I guess the show with Cirque du Soleil was just a presentation to get people excited for the MS Conference (including Natal). Maybe the show was just basically a "trailer" for Natal.
Anyway, hopefully MS lives up to it.
Well, Natal still has a chance to be a decent product, the problem here is that MS clearly overdid their show. It's not an embarrassment because Kinect might be shit, it's because Microsoft relied on Cirque du Soleil to speak for the product. Even then, they didn't even show much of Natal anyway, just clips, which is stupid.
It's like there was more dancing than Natal lol. Anyway, after that crappy show, MS better redeem themselves by actually showing off Nata...
I don't know what you're trying to get at here, I forgot about other games after playing their betas (like BFBC2, COD4 etc...) and that's probably because we have other games to look forward too.
Why is major nelson a douche? I've never seen him trash talk the PS3, in fact, doesn't he have one?
Would it be possible to link me to an article of where he says something bad? I would like to know.
Did you guys read the article? Cliff just called out CVG for misquoting him. If anything, CVG are complete douches just fueling the flames just to get hits.
I knew that CVG article was BS. Geez PS3 fanboys were having a jerk-off session when they saw that article.
"That's cool that they did that, but they don't do it anymore, know why? because it's stupid. Split screen has always been stupid, and will always be stupid."
lolwut?
Halo Reach has 4 player splitscreen online.
I thought Brutal Legend was from EA?
Ohhhh shhuuutttt uuuupppp. Geez you guys get so pathetically annoying just because this was possible on the 360. Instead of congratulating the efforts of iD, you attempt to bring the game down just because it's multi-plat. It's the same damn thing with MGS: Rising, just because it's on the 360 you immediately downplay it. If it was only on PS3 looking the same, you guys would be praising it like there's no tomorrow.
First of all you guys were only touting the ...