He says 500 million poly's a second, but dont forget thats without colour and everything. ou cant leave that out. Its not a lie, but its not entirely truthful either.
He pointed out many weaknesses about the 360's architecture, so how is that being biased towards the 360? Also, what the hell does playing the system have to do with tech specs? Maybe you should go back to school, hes talking hardware not software, so hes not in your field. If this were a games comparison it would be entirely biased, because each person likes their own games. But since some of the people posting here seem to know more then this guy, why dont they make their own tech spec comp...
I agree with you, i stated that further up in the page, but according to phil harrision your buying the PS3 for its "potential".
Good god, hes praising the 360 GPU, not the 360. What the hell is your problem, everything has to be knocking the PS3! Guess what, the 360's GPU is quite nice, the closest card to DirectX 10 right now, and a lot of future is in that card. Chill out. Just because he doesnt support your views, he isnt underhanded. Im sure he left out stuff about the 360. But if he went into full detail it would have been hundreds of pages. Those machines have more then you know in them.
Also, if...
Reasons why i love this man:
1. He calls people out on their bull, and sets it straight
2. He actually knows what hes talking about
3. He is not biased, he openly admits systems strengths and weaknesses
People had better not debate this article, youll lose.
P.S. all this is worthless if the games are crappy
HAHA i love how stupid some of you are. 1st gen vs 2nd gen game? What are you retarded? They arent going to redesign textures or models for each system, so why would it look any different? The only difference is the PS3 version is slightly darker, and the player playing on the PS3 sucks.
Also, i meant no offense by saying that the PS3 player sucks, its merely what i observed.
PS3 skies look nicer.
I love gears, looks awesome. Also, please stop this DVD-9 vs blu-ray storage again. Devs are putting some of the storage on HD, so are we to believe that they dont trust blu-ray enough? You guys are being stupid, DVD-9 is enough, and even if it isnt, digital distribution has begun, as i said :).
My comment wasnt an argument, it was a fact. There for it shouldnt be agreed/disagreed with, because its true no matter what anyone thinks.
Piss off, i played it for 5 hours straight with no freezing.
I have a 53 inch TV :) lol. Also, i know people with tv's that accept 1080p, except they arent big enough for it to matter.
DJ, i agree with the first part, you really dont need 1080p unless you have a very large TV. But, Splinter Cell is already 1080p on 360, and 360 supports it, so 360 is the choice on both counts.
Reason your an idiot: Its not progression its progressive.
HAHA i like how you put that. :)
Holy Crap! The only other game i know that got a perfect 10 from anyone was KOTOR, speaking of which that game rules (cant wait to play Mass Effect).
Ok come on people, you have to agree that i called this.
agreed, but new experiences are what makes a game. Destructable environments already bore me. Everything has them now. I want something new, like running around on water and then diving into it to dodge a bullet or something crazy.
Well im happy they finally decided on some specs :). Oh and DJ, while you technically are right that they used all 3 cores on PGR3 and Kameo, they didnt use all threads, so they werent using all of the systems power.
Search esrb.org, no rating, no game. Halo 3 is not listed.
Its javascript, if anyone else wants a counter ill make it while drunk.