Dark_Crow

Member
CRank: 5Score: 5910

Yes but how do they know that beforehand.

Silly comment.

3675d ago 12 agree4 disagreeView comment

Indies and triple A games are the same in my point of view.

I expect a good game regardless of what it's classified as.

3676d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Haven't played it yet and was always curious.

3676d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yes that was one issue I've had with recent co op games..if I wanted to Olay with someone in the same room I wouldn't be able to.

Now maybe all that will change.

3676d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Interesting.
Never knew

3676d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

@Majin

Well the camera is actually really cool.
And I dont know if your with the times but you dont need to buy the version with the camera anymore.

And both consoles are underpowered.

3676d ago 8 agree6 disagreeView comment

It's a mystery to me.
Has he done anything outside of metal gears?

3676d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

I also have a feeling you were talking about the order 1886.

That game is short ...too short for 60$
Sorry. Not to mention the abundant issues the game has. Which is why people said it wasn't worth the 60$

When a game is bad or generally perceived as bad by most then people tend to say the game isn't worth it.

3676d ago 4 agree5 disagreeView comment

I think it's more about whether we feel entitled to a robust complete game.
Not so much whether it's the way we want or not.

Many games release with clear plans for dlc and the game shows it thru how lacking it is in content. They purposefully omit stuff instead of working to have it all completed on time.

A developer will have to pay its employees for the work regardless so why not take advantage of that and divide that work into small dlc pa...

3676d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

You're sorely misinformed. This deal was in place before Phil.

3676d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exclusive Shit is already anti gamer. MS is limiting the crap atleast. This would be better with no exclusive anything.

3676d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yea somehow that bullshit didn't get a lot of attention....wonder why the Fuck not.

3676d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I dint mind timed. It's a way for customers and developers to incentivise certain versions.

Timed exclusivity shouldn't be for too long either 30 days is actually the best I've seen so far. I would actually love it if both console versions had different timed exclusive stuff and then you have to pick which you wanna play first.

Obviously no timed is better but it definitely beats permanent exclusive like in Destiny.

Exclusive dlc ...

3676d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well at least it isn't permanent exclusive stupid anti gamer shit.

Yes looking at you Destiny.

3676d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Street fighter is a fighting game and the franchise doesn't really need a campaign.

It needs modes characters and innovation.

3676d ago 0 agree6 disagreeView comment

Sony doesn't own Capcom. The only possibility with Sony being involved is in the console exclusivity deal...

This is all on capcom.

3676d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment

The $60 tag should come with the full game not the beta. Or 1st chapter with the promise of more content.

They literally sold you a season pass instead of a game.

3676d ago 11 agree2 disagreeView comment

Sounds like a hell of a time.

3677d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Maybe Capcom should focus more on making the game next time instead of showing up with boxing gloves at e3 and other conferences making a fool of themselves.

3677d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not what he was saying at all. There will be more gameplay then cutscenes....lots lots more.

Cutscenes have never been big on remedy games and they still manage to tell great stories.

3677d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment