DLC is the scourge and the gift of this generation. Day one DLC, stuff cut from the game, pre-order DLC and platform exclusive DLC is ruining otherwise great games. Then there is awesome DLC that actually expands the game, and is created after the game is finished.
I don't know about anyone else, but I always get the feeling I am missing out if I don't buy DLC for my games, even if I don't think it's worth the cost. This is why I think DLC has been so successf...
We will have to wait and see if it delivers. It seemed inevitable that Arkham City would get so much hype after Arkham Asylum was such a sleeper hit. It's got big expectations to live up to.
Where did I say that I wanted them to take it out? Saying that I think it would be better with out multiplayer isn't the same as 'moaning' that they should remove it. I am aware that many people enjoy it, one of my friends loves Uncharted's multiplayer. I was just expressing my opinion, just as you are, but I managed to do it without insulting people that disagree with me.
@Tarantino_Life - I said to me, I'm not doubting it's popularity. Have you got a proof that it's the 2nd most popular online game?
@Ramzadel - I'm not the best player ever, but it definitely wasn't because I was bad at it. I hated it for a few reasons: grenade spam, fixed weapon spawns, poor matchmaking and the massive load times when I hadn't played multiplayer for awhile.
I think that if Naughty Dog really wanted multiplayer they ...
I've got to agree, to me Uncharted is all about the single player. It's why Uncharted is my favourite series on PS3. I tried Uncharted 2 multiplayer and thought it was terrible, the beta of Uncharted 3 was just as bad. Personally I think it would be way better without any multiplayer at all.
@rexbolt - I would reply to you but I have no idea at all what you are saying. It's not a criticism, English may not be be your first language.
@PirateThom - I assume you are talking to rexbolt, because by my definition Fallout 3 and Oblivion are both RPGs.
If you don't have to create a character to be an RPG. Then nearly every game is an RPG. Is inFAMOUS an RPG? it has unlockable abilities. If you say an RPG is a game where you "play a role"...
Personally, I believe that an RPG must have three things:
1) Character creation
2) Skills, talents, specialisations, perks, levels etc.
3) An Inventory
If a game doesn't have all of these I would say it only has RPG elements. For example Deus Ex:Human Revolution is an FPS with RPG elements. However many may disagree with me. The authors definition is Role-Playing-Game in the literal sense, but by that classification any g...
Isn't this conquest on the Metro map from the Alpha and Beta?
Origin, launch from Battlelog, no in-game party system. Battlefield 3 seems to be getting worse and worse. Looks like I'm not going to be getting it; I may have got it later down the line, but I refuse to pay extra for finished content cut from the game as pre-order DLC (Back to Karkand).
This is a really great mod, I hope they make one for New Vegas, because I only have Fallout 3 on PS3. I've always thought what Wasteland DC would look like reclaimed by nature.
Timed exclusive DLC is awful; if a game is on multiple platforms the content should be the same, technical limitations aside, on all platforms. Another annoying thing is that "Back to Karkand" is finished, but you have to pre-order, or buy later, to play it. How is stuff legal? if it is finished before the game ships, it should be included on the disc, or given as free DLC to all after release.
This is being blown out of proportion. The fan was asking a question fair enough, but he was being an ass about it. Pete was kind enough to answer his question, and pointed out that he was being kind of an ass. He wasn't insulting the guy, he was just telling him that wasn't the way to ask a question.
So lets see the changes:
-point pop-ups moved slightly to the right
-slightly improved sound, but still sub-par
-New announcer
-a few new textures/models
-a few new guns/perks, but the removal of some as well
Yep that is totally worth a new fully priced sequel.
Nice screenshots, and I hope it looks/run well on console. However those screens are bullshots: 1,920px × 1,080px (scaled to 1,282px × 721px) is what it says in image info.
Bit disappointing, I always thought Elder Scrolls could use more gore (not over-the-top; just realistic wounds and blood) Skyrim seems to be taking it in the right direction though. Ah well, there's always mods.
I prefer BBFC ratings, it standardises film and game ratings, as well as having 15 instead of 16+.
Even if that is the correct number (I can't be bothered checking) PSN covers PSP, multiple free accounts, qriocity? (not sure, correct me if i'm wrong) and anyone who wants to make an account on their website.
However this is beside the point, as you are clearly trolling by bringing up PSN on a Steam article.
I have mixed feelings about revealing Tali's face. On the one hand I want to see what my favourite ME character actually looks like. However I also think it would be strange, and could change the way I view her as a character. I would much prefer that you just see another Quarians face. From that you get the gist of what Tali could looks like, without removing the mystery completely.
Only thing stopping me getting this bundle is the price. Sony completely screwed over the UK and the rest of Europe with the pricing: $819 in the UK, $724 in Euro countries. I know our prices include VAT, but even with the extra 20% it's still a rip-off.
I don't mind the addition of multiplayer; we don't even know what form it will take, so I won't dismiss it immediately. As long as the single player experience is up to par with the last two games I'll be happy.