That's some crappy ass vision running at 30fps. Pretty sure they'd need more than glasses
Kingkonic
Arkane ...the developer's of Dishonored and prey ...
Hmmm to there is something deranged about your comment that's for sure.
Yeah well...Sony didn't go forcing square to not release it after the deal...that's their choice.
Seeing as this would be a monopoly on Western gaming companies...don't see your point.
Sony hasn't bought all Asian companies.
When square themselves look for potential deals sure. Microsoft had the same opportunity.
The game does have fps stuttering based on recent gameplay at different times.
Cuz now its a creative choice.
Sales are important. The lack of sales will lead to mtx money...but that's why they're important
Ghost scholar
If the most Xbox series x can do is 30fps...that's really sad. How come the series s which is ifnijtiely weaker can also do 30fps? Resolution difference isn't that big....hmmm
Could Xbox series x be secretly a lot weaker than the PS5.....? Your words. Not mine.
Though if I were you I'd take Phil's stance about it being purely a creative choice.
When you remove a huge base. The biggest base...yeah we'll see..should be interesting.
There's Zelda, spiderman 2 and starfield this year. All supposed to be huge.
What a dumb title. The fans are on PlayStation. Those guys that made up the majority of sales for Bethesdas Skyrim...yeahhh
I'm not going to say that 30 FPS breaks the game because we've been playing games at 30 FPS for a long time and they were perfectly fine as long as it was a steady 30. But to claim it's a creative decision is a downright lie and that's just typical of Spencer
That's what I was thinking. Technically he didn't lie...but still not what we wanted at all..
So...it's been how many years and you didn't expect it? Wow....I guess the whole waiting game has really been engrained in the Xbox fanbase.
@KingKionic
Not much better than watching a cinematic cutscene...Xbox didnt deliver in showing gameplay...and the little shown wasnt all that great.
@notorious..
well redfall says hi.
And yes they werent "planned" as bad games but they were developed and reeked of mediocrity throughout development without any course correction from Microsoft. They dont know what a good games looks like.
Only 1 is truly noteworthy, potentially anyways. As expected. Quantity over quality is Microsofts goal. All about content.
Its the people into the console fanboyism that havent played the first one yet feel like making silly claims.
You dont read enough comments. Its been compared...quite stupidly...but its happened. Theyre entirely different types of games. Not important enough to jot down usernames of course.
Dude. It's a game....they're not actually in space. You're making it sound like they're doing some crazy star trek technology in game development