He literally has a comment where he states his interest is low but will be trying it on gamepass.
Try to be more dishonest...it'll be tough for you.
956d ago 28 agree4 disagreeView commentInappropriate
@oldmcgroin
So yeah what he said is that 90% have no life...he didn't say anything about the remaining 100...will they have much? Nobody knows. Don't pretend that what he didn't say makes those 100 actually meaningful.
I love how they're not really specific. However one thing I will credit to Microsoft is that you really don't know what they intend to release as multiplat in the future. For all we know a year later starfield may show up on PlayStation 5. That's not me wishing it cuz I'll be playing it at launch. They may do this depending on how much money it actually brings in.
Microsoft did say that it's a case-by-case basis and you would think that something is Big...
Absolutely right! Finally some sense. Or at least half of it. The game doesn't look out of this world...why can't it manage 60fps at a higher resolution? Devil may cry 4 anyone?
Optimization is key here. While you ask for things to be dumbed down in order to excuse another game ..i say let's ask for that optimization to elevate games.
What Sony should do if they really don't want this deal to go through is state that they will not have call of duty on their platform if the deal goes through. This will hurt the sales like ridiculously so and make it not very ideal. It will make the deal not worth it anymore.
If the deal goes through and they give in to the 10-year deal or whatever then they allow Microsoft to recoup a lot of the costs of the deal. If they don't want that to happen to the point of ...
He wasn't all that instrumental in the first last of us...if he had his way the game would have been vastly different. Bruce made it what we love and remember today.
Uncharted 4 is my least favourite of the big 3. I don't really care much for uncharted 3. But again...Bruce straley was involved...
But with last of us 2...Bruce wasn't there...and it's the most controversial game ...still great in many ways but completely divided the fanbase....
Of course they want to surpass competition...you don't see them buying up all the big 3rd party devs do you?
Doing that kind of thing when gaming has grown to what it is today is a huge deal...and Microsoft are doing it and they've done it...this is their second deal that's too big.
@crazycoconuts
Blind fanboyism or blind political people don't change opinions based on facts.
Good opinions are based on facts or life experiences. They can be broad or personal. But facts can form or reinform opinions. Like if I told you that bees/wasps won't usually sting you unless you're aggressive towards them or near their hive. Knowing more can change your behaviour and opinions on something.
So there's an email out there that clearly states Microsoft's intention and your response is that these organizations found that it had no weight. Which is your assumption by the way. Why not the response be hey look it's true they really just wanted to exclude a bunch of gamers not because of a relationship but because then you it would hurt the competition it would hurt all PlayStation gamers.
This is a problem I have with the Xbox "fans" here. They ...
@oldmcgroin
So yeah what he said is that 90% have no life...he didn't say anything about the remaining 100...will they have much? Nobody knows. Don't pretend that what he didn't say makes those 100 actually meaningful.
This is a Bethesda game. Expect a Bethesda game.
@kingkionic
5hat logic only works when it's actually to one title...Xbox has had many bad 1st party titles...or average.
Solid title??? At least wait until it releases.
PC gamers get to enjoy both streets.
Who said it's okay?
I love how they're not really specific. However one thing I will credit to Microsoft is that you really don't know what they intend to release as multiplat in the future. For all we know a year later starfield may show up on PlayStation 5. That's not me wishing it cuz I'll be playing it at launch. They may do this depending on how much money it actually brings in.
Microsoft did say that it's a case-by-case basis and you would think that something is Big...
Nah...it's not game a vs game b. It's about being consistent.
4k/60fps has always been a pipe dream. I only remember one base going crazy about it last gen.
Absolutely right! Finally some sense. Or at least half of it. The game doesn't look out of this world...why can't it manage 60fps at a higher resolution? Devil may cry 4 anyone?
Optimization is key here. While you ask for things to be dumbed down in order to excuse another game ..i say let's ask for that optimization to elevate games.
There will still be ff7 part 2.
This is a continuation of ff15 approach...vastly improved it seems.
What Sony should do if they really don't want this deal to go through is state that they will not have call of duty on their platform if the deal goes through. This will hurt the sales like ridiculously so and make it not very ideal. It will make the deal not worth it anymore.
If the deal goes through and they give in to the 10-year deal or whatever then they allow Microsoft to recoup a lot of the costs of the deal. If they don't want that to happen to the point of ...
Obviously didn't read it but don't blame him. Most people don't or won't to avoid giving clicks...it's a habit at this point.
PC gamepass stays the same.
This makes ps extra even greater value as it will be even cheaper at every level than before.
He wasn't all that instrumental in the first last of us...if he had his way the game would have been vastly different. Bruce made it what we love and remember today.
Uncharted 4 is my least favourite of the big 3. I don't really care much for uncharted 3. But again...Bruce straley was involved...
But with last of us 2...Bruce wasn't there...and it's the most controversial game ...still great in many ways but completely divided the fanbase....
Examples please...you can't give any I know...but it would help your argument.
Of course they want to surpass competition...you don't see them buying up all the big 3rd party devs do you?
Doing that kind of thing when gaming has grown to what it is today is a huge deal...and Microsoft are doing it and they've done it...this is their second deal that's too big.
@crazycoconuts
Blind fanboyism or blind political people don't change opinions based on facts.
Good opinions are based on facts or life experiences. They can be broad or personal. But facts can form or reinform opinions. Like if I told you that bees/wasps won't usually sting you unless you're aggressive towards them or near their hive. Knowing more can change your behaviour and opinions on something.
Some here don't change at all ...
So there's an email out there that clearly states Microsoft's intention and your response is that these organizations found that it had no weight. Which is your assumption by the way. Why not the response be hey look it's true they really just wanted to exclude a bunch of gamers not because of a relationship but because then you it would hurt the competition it would hurt all PlayStation gamers.
This is a problem I have with the Xbox "fans" here. They ...
Absolutely agree. I pretend the second doesn't exist.
Neil druckman at the helm...don't hold your breath. Could be great but I'll wait until it gets reviewed...whatever it is.
I hope not. Returnal was incredible and so was ratchet...and ghosts of tsushima.
I'd like to see an infamous game this generation and a resistance reboot along with new IP.