I am honoured to receive PS3 fanboy rage and inappropriate moderation

commodore64

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 36270

You make an excellent point, alpha.

I have said the same thing before, many times and I'll have to say it again.

The double standard amongst the ps3 camp is scarcely a secret anymore.
You can bet money on the fact that when the 360 publishes in a sub HD resolution it is deemed irrefutable proof that it is inferior - even holding the ps3 back.

Ironically, when the ps3 exhibits inferior performance in any way, shape or form, the ps...

5718d ago 4 agree7 disagreeView comment

lol at Karl
good one.
I love a bit of humour in the n4g battlezone.

Your comment begs the question:
If the ps3 runs the 360 Rdr version in b/compatibility mode, will it run better than the ps3 version?

;)

5719d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

agreed, IdleLee

This is about the removal of an advertised feature that was used to sell consoles.

4 class action lawsuits (!) on this issue certainly shows that significant numbers of consumers are feeling deceived enough to warrant the hassle and expense of a lawsuit against a major Conglomerate.

People don't start these kinds of lawsuits without a reasonable chance of success, due to the cost involved.
The fact that there are n...

5719d ago 9 agree25 disagreeView comment

@ obama

"If it's not exclusive it will be gimped for sure"

Do you mean to say that RDR was also gimped because it was released as a multiplat?
How can this be? The game is AAA.
It stands at 95 on MC - universal acclaim?

Pray tell me, which console seems to be the one that held this game back?

Again, Logic fail.

5719d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Ok well I am glad that at least some ps3 users are seeing the truth here.

The Firmware update is now officially compulsory.

You want to play games? Must update
You wanna use PSN? Must update.

There is no choice here.
Anyone who bought the ps3 based on the heavily promoted 'Linux included' ad campaign has been deceived.
That much is clear.

5719d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

I agree IdleLee.

I looked at the ps3 shots in disbelief.
The disparity was readily apparent.

The 360 shots seemed so much more crisper and lifelike.

Occasionally I wondered if the developers had purposely gimped the ps3 version. Sadly, that doesn't seem to be the case as the developers had obviously been forced to reduce the ps3 resolution as well as reduce the polygon count to get it to perform on par with the 360.

5719d ago 2 agree12 disagreeView comment

@ corepred

The study you refer to has been debunked numerous times, as it exhibits selection bias and sampling bias.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

For the study to be effective, the study needs to be a "random sample of a population (or non-human factors) in wh...

5720d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

LOL

"why would you want a Sony dev to dumb their games down for lesser hardware"

Hmmm rockstar didn't seem to have much trouble producing a fabulous AAA title just a shortwhile ago which runs much better on the supposedly inferior hardware you refer to.

Is so weird how that happened.
Don't Rockstar know that the PS3 is superior?

You better write them a letter, Bathyj, and tell 'em!
How da...

5721d ago 3 agree12 disagreeView comment

@ clown
Yeah lol...

The 360 has posted increased sales, while the ps3 has posted decreases.
However, the ps3 still sold 4 times as many consoles...

I guess, if we saw the ps3 decreasing in sales for a few weeks, months, then maybe we could draw some conclusions.

As it stands the ps3 is still riding the crest of the pricut and slim wave.
The next few months will be interesting... will the ps3 momentum continue...

5721d ago 0 agree6 disagreeView comment

@ army.

Dude, 'remember' and others are getting disagrees because the ps3 fans cannot stand it when the ps3 peforms worse and is called out.

When the PS3 excells, then we must laud it for its awesome prowess.

funnily enough, when the ps3 underperforms, we must make excuses, blame developers, downplay the differences - ANYTHING except acknowldege the facts that the ps3 underperformed.

This is the unwritten rule...

5721d ago 12 agree11 disagreeView comment

@ silverslug.

The reason this is such a big deal, is because we have been told so very many times by the ps3 fanboys about how the ps3 was going to be the second coming of christ and how the 360 was holding it back, DVD problems, etc etc.

Now, in 2010, we have an astoundingly good AAA multiplat game in the form of rdr.
The game is huge and its awesome.
However, it simply looks better on the 360.

It was not held back by dvd, no...

5722d ago 15 agree18 disagreeView comment

wrong.
This is Huge.

That's why it has been posted numerous times, on the front page, no less.
When Lensoftruth do their piece, it will again be on the front page.
When Ironfoundry do their piece, ditto.
.. and so on.

The reason it is posted repeatedly is that gamers want confirmation from as many credible sources as possible.
I really don't need to tell you guys that if this news was restricted to a single sour...

5722d ago 0 agree6 disagreeView comment

@ nike.

Why should it stop?

This is HUGE!

RDR is a fabulous AAA game.
It looks awesome, on 360
It plays awesome, on 360.

This is so important it's not funny.
Don't try to downplay the issue, let alone sweep it under the carpet.

This ENTIRE generation ps3 fanboys have waxed lyrical of the legendary prowess of the now four year old ps3.

Inferior ps3 multiplats we...

5722d ago 3 agree18 disagreeView comment

@ ^^^

oh wait.
a sony fanboy with more excuses?

The titles i mentioned are the tip of the iceberg.
You and I both know there are over 100 further examples to illustrate my point.

Don't get angry.

5722d ago 2 agree11 disagreeView comment

I would like to suggest that maybe rockstar was able to optimise both versions, yet were able to extract more performance from the 360.

Why does an inferior ps3 game mean the developer didnt bother to maximise the ps3?
Perhaps they did maximise it and this is the result?

Think.

5722d ago 4 agree10 disagreeView comment

I agree with the guy above me.

This video highlights the blurry quincunx aa on the ps3.
Overall, I would say that ps3 fans probably won't notice the 'hazey' effect unless they then immediately play the game on 360.
To most honest gamers, the difference is quite apparent.

It's funny, when ps3 fans talk about UC2 vs Gears of war 2, or FFXiii, they seem to have the sharpest eagle eyes and discerning gamer pallates that one c...

5722d ago 8 agree16 disagreeView comment

an excellent post, Socrates.

I too, am sick of the double standards amongst our 'gaming community'.
We have evidence of over 100 multiplats that simply perform worse on the ps3, no question.
This gets blamed on anything but the possibility that the ps3 isn't quite all its cracked up to be.

Yet, when KZ2, UC2 and Gow3 are brought up, it is somehow heralded as unquestionable proof that the ps3 is untouchable.

...

5722d ago 5 agree14 disagreeView comment

wrong.

Quite honesty, this article seems like just another ps3 fan blog.
Unfortunately, the author disregarded the facts amidst his fanboy fervour.

The ps3, at last count, has lost $4.7 billion.
In fact, the ps3 has lost more money, and quicker, than the xbox1 did!
http://www.joystiq.com/2009...

T...

5723d ago 22 agree35 disagreeView comment

@ the rabble above.

The ps3 retails for $450 here.

The 150,000 bravia deals are giveaways which artifially inflate the ps3 sales here.

What's more, while bathyj's point of mobile phone deals did include 360 giveaways, he conveniently also forgot that the same is also true of the ps3, thus his point is negated, sadly.

My point was that 150000 bravia ps3 giveaways was a strategy that MS did not take with its 360. Thus t...

5723d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Lol x2

i know.. right?

the 360's smooth frame-rate, clarity, sharpness, improved shadows and lack of pop in are also not to his liking.

5723d ago 9 agree14 disagreeView comment