Time to re-visit. Maybe even waste some serious time.
I hope you aren't accusing him of asking a nonsense question and proposing it as flamebaitingly as possible. Or of issuing a disingenuous apology right at the outset to fend of (totally true) accusations of flamebaiting for site hits. I hope you aren't calling this article a perfect example of what's wrong with "gaming media".
Because if so I would be disappointed.
There you go buddy, don't let having absolutely nothing to write about stop you from writing!
This game has a few technical issues on the PS3, but despite that I'm very happy with my purchase. Great game. I just hope the devs are working on fixes.
Too bad they didn't make my head explode before I got to know about the existence of that article.
@MrBeatdown
Don't mind him, it's his game to subtly troll the PS3 whenever possible. Even though it usually isn't quite as subtle as intended.
"The mandatory install size of the PlayStation 3 version of Batman: Arkham City has been revealed. Hop inside to see how much space you’ll need to set aside on your PS3′s HDD."
They could've just said the size in about 1/10 of the space/time.
Bubs. There are so many ways to destroy this tired and flimsy argument in support of these passes, one can only get around to so much in a single post. Good to know at least one other person is in here picking up the slack.
"More money means more games and with that hopefully means better games. It’s not complicated and hopefully means less of this..."
What 12-year-old wrote this? The naivete displayed here is astonishing, especially when you note that he proceeds it by acknowledging an exact reason (amongst several) why it's so childish.
"Sure, a portion of that money will probably end up going to EA’s chief of executive chief-ing"
More ...
Try a little harder to do what?
No achievement for buying the same game 3 years in a row? While you skip an entire console generation for the Beyond Good & Evil sequel? Shove it Ubisoft.
That, OR the reviewers can just do their jobs responsibly and refrain from including major spoilers in their reviews.
Let me know when they're making another one for PS3, then I'll give a shit about it coming to NA.
Deadliest Warrior should have been an awesome game. Totally wrong approach and lackluster execution of that approach saw to it that its potential went completely unfulfilled.
This is the online one, right? I think I just might have to return to the DW series for this one.
But... but... Kojima isn't ever going to die...
Actually you're the one who doesn't understand it. The game is working the way it's supposed to, newcomers just don't get it yet.
The party system works fine, it's just very unconventional and people don't understand it. Demon's/Dark Souls aren't the kind of games where they want you to team up with your buddies. Check that shit at the door, save it for COD.
*edit*
Seriously, if your buying this game hinged on teaming up with buddies, this game was never for you to begin with.
And by the way, that blanket statement might not sound so reasonable to you if we were talking Kotick instead of Blezinski.
He also got to do nothing with anyone else online... Kind of hard to tell MMORPGs aren't your thing if you haven't participated in the MMO part of things.