I don't remember seeing any single Japanese women.
There's very little WW in this game. It's modern day with a simple re-skin.
Some of the character designs are straight out of Apocalypse Now, so there's definitely some Vietnam in it. The MG also makes no historical sense whatsoever, and looks like a simple re-skin of an M60.
It's the cheap cop-out development we have come to expect from most multi-platform "historical" games as of late, unfortunately. It's significantly cheaper and easier to just take some random designs from history and make your own clusterf*ck than to spend time researching what actually took place.
There is nothing in that article that mentions anything about micro-transactions. Other articles, however, state quite specifically that there are, in fact, micro-transactions. They are cosmetic only, but they are there. On disc, locked behind a paywall.
This is the only one you'll need. ;)
Did the writer make up a new meaning for the word "riff"?
I find the fact that it's a completely fabricated alternate reality kind of revolutionary, I suppose. It looks like The Order: 1886 with WWII-esque things. I also appreciate how they call it Battlefield 5 and not Battlefield WWII, since this is absolutely NOT WWII.
Each one of those upgrades is going to be purchasable, either through a loot box system or individually. It's EA, after all.
The charge cable uses Micro-USB, though. I f*cking despise Micro-USB.
It's difficult to take your opinion seriously when you've clearly only ever used XBox controllers.
You need real hands.
It could use a bigger battery as well.
All this says is that the controller is way too overpriced. Great for Sony, bad for consumers.
Wow, I wonder how much the complete game will actually cost. $2000 for everything on the disc?
I think it looks great, especially the neat side buttons, but why did they ruin the analog stick placement? Offset sticks are awful.
I bet one could make a drinking game out of it. Take a shot every time someone says "Micro-Transaction," "Loot Box," "DLC," "Season Pass," or "Give me your money you stupid c*nts."
The older ones did, yes, as they should. For example, have you ever driven a Dodge Charger before? Because I have. I own a 1968 R/T and I can guarantee 100% that the car representing a Charger in GTA IV handles almost exactly the same.
@CrimsonIdol The complaints for everyone except you have been that the physics are TOO realistic. They don't want a Gran Tourismo experience while playing GTA, they want more arcade-like driving because crashing so easily while swerving in and out of traffic was frustrating for most people. That's a fair argument to make. Saying the physics are unrealistic is just ridiculous.
BC3 will never come because DICE doesn't make good games any more.