If gamers can't read inbetween the lines on that one and still go out and support the 360 then they trully deserve begining dumped on just like MS did with them on the xbox.
I.. I have no words.
*walks off shaking head. Turns round, gazes at Fox News for a minute and continues to walk off shaking head*
Haha. I have no idea why I haven't seen sigs with the same layout for gamespot like they have when they bann you.
That would be cool to see
"User name: gamespot - YOU ARE DEAD (RE stlye like they use)
GAME OVER! This gamesite is banned, no continues - Banned from the gaming community, woe is me"
LMAO!! XD
I have no idea why I haven't seen sigs with the same layout for gamespot like they have when they bann you.
That would be cool to see
"User name: gamespot - YOU ARE DEAD (RE stlye like they use)
GAME OVER! This gamesite is banned, no continues"
LMAO!! XD
I see gamespy didnt' get the memo that the check was in the mail.
Reading the review it's sooooooo obvious that had this been a PS3 exclusive it would have been slammed with a 6.5
Editorial reivews have become meaningless dribble to the gaming community only motivated by incentives and laced in politics.
Turn based startegy is a genre. There's no genre that's last gen. They are eitehr popular or not so popular but they are still relevant to their fanbase jsut like other genres.
..and that's why I really raise an eyebrow at a final score of 8.2
I mean, WTF?! a "four disc!" story driven RPG with mediocre story and no replaybility gets an 8.2? It seems, like always, reviewers - for what ever the reason :P - are showing their ways again with really soft reviews for the 360 exclusives.
Had this been a PS3 exclusive it would have been nailed with a 6 or 6.5 easy.
Well you don't need reviews to tell you Crusin for the wii is crap. Just look at all the media and info out on it already.
Editorial reviews are archaic and have long out lasted their usefullness. In our world of varied media formats, we gamers can help our ownselves with reviews etc.
Community user based content is obviously the right direction and our info on games should head in this direction also.
Oh and - 'UCK gamespot!
He's already gone I believe.
Oh please that's jsut a tad bit tooo dramatic. These guys were jsut regular fat 'uck lakies that will be replaced and forgotten in due time.
Comparing Jeff to frikgen Mario is ridiculously absurd.
and I will stay as far away from it as is possible. They're all toss pots.
They'll go get one or two hot looking editors and the gaming community will go "ohh, gamespot new ediotors are hot. It's good they've become good again" and that will be that - business back to normal.
I'm supposed to give a toss about this fat 'uck because why?
'UCK gamespot and it's holyer-than-thou-attitude moronic employees, they can all roast in hell for all I care.
And to those who think gamespot is finished - you all need to wake up. They, and all major gaming sites, have been fooling and toying with the gaming community for years and we still accpeted their BS.
Gamespot will keep do great. They'll get a new staff of morons and put out som...
Because a majority of Playstation gaming products don't just sell high for 2-3 months but rather keep selling, with peaks and lows, through out the generation's life span.
Ok, that was funny. I give you bubbles.
I would oridinarily agree with you on that but this isn't Crysis. This is StarCraft; it's a massive money maker already and the questions is, would the developers like to make even more $$ by bring the experience to a wider audience via consoles?
Every time I read news about HOME my knees seem to jsut buckle. I jsut can't wait for this feature.
and uhmm, kinda reminds me of a low budget PC shooter. Wow, consoles have come a long way.
I think we've been totally spoilt by very high end, high production shooters that we kinda forget not every game's going to be like that. For what it is, I didn't find it so unappealing just a normal low budget type FPS that you can find a boat load of for PCs.
I'm assuming retail will be something like $29.99 brand new or something. I tried out the online Co-op MP too and ...
He didn't mean they HAVE to sell 1 million copies on day one to turn a profit, he jsut meant that if they were to turn a profit on day one they'd have to sell 1 million.
So he's just stating that when MGS4 hits a million, they'll start to turn a profit that's all and if they sell that on day one then they'll turn profit on day one.
The way people are twisting his comment makes it seem like if MGS4 doens't sell 1 million on day one then it's floped and failed. <...