nintendo still has QA? wow. who would've thought. oh sorry, i meant who would of thought. the millennials should get what i say, too ;-)
isn't this the case with every online competitive game? at least i stopped supporting/playing online based games years ago.
the problem is that the majority of the gaming industry comes with this "mee too"-approach. everybody and their mother want to offer an open worlder, just because it is trendy and gta sells so many units. the thing is, that maybe only 1 or 2 studios are capable of producing a proper open worlder. one that does not feel pointles, sterile and just filled with icons for the sake of it. the latest example being horizon zero dawn. beautifully drawn, huge world, but repetitive asf. they t...
thanks for saving me the click!!
and why would i exactly want to carry around a bulky thing just to play decades old titles when there are so many titles getting released for current gen machines? if i wanted bulky and mobile and inconvenience i would choose to buy a nintendo product. i'm not. because seriously, nostalgia is all good and well. but if you get lost into it, products like these are here to rob you of your money.
why would they. gta5 is first and foremost an online cashgrab for them. why would they seriously bother developping a story dlc? in turn, i did not bother with gta5 because it was too heavily focused on multiplayer. no fun.
sounds fitting for that little weak machine,
i don't play or pay for a multiplayer based game. thanks for nothing, industry,
already moved on from that game, graphics nice, gameplay repetitive asf. foto mode? thanks for nothing.
please, eight studios, leave it at that. don't port that stuff to the real consoles. thanks.
playing anywhere is not really the future. it is already now and it has been so for a while. just dedicated consoles for it are a thing of the past,
the game that never was
what? last time i checked the switch was floating dead in the water.
jack and daxter is such an awfully bad game. also, every sequel they ever made: so unnecessary. best example: the uncharted series. first one okay, second one a bit more of the same and 3 and 4 one snoozefest because treading the mill. people like to practice blind fanboyism. as soon as their favourite brand logo is somewhere to be seen, they totally lose it. i'd like for naughty dog to rehash a little less and innovate a little bit more. would be good for gamers. also, the fanboys would ...
sorry, apologists. i still don't see the point of handheld gaming on dedicated machines in 2017. personally, i for sure do not game on the go. if i wanted to, i would have used my vita more often than i did. i just hope for nintendo that the niche of kids without a tv set of their own will be big enough to make some bucks.
the point of these speed runs being?
i don't know. i heard it had some technical issues. but to begin with: you just don't continue a trilogy with another sequel just because you want to cash in on a franchise name. people in general are dumb asf. but as clients they know right from wrong. one should not temper with clients. which they clearly did.
uh, multiplayer based shooter? pass. thanks for nothing ;-)
do some market research and check what gamers want out of VR. then maybe the butthurtness will not be as severe as it is with these generic multiplayershooters.
because of what? i think some devs need to rethink their approach to this business. jesus.
the convenience of not having to deal with a proper online service and not many games on the shelves? sure, that's really something every serious gamer should get. forget about the staleness of every n-title. just swallow it all up because nintendo. i don't think so.