it was boring asf. didn't even bother to click this apologist blog
it is not a good kart game. the feeling lacks the fun of other entries in this genre. not even the VR-ness of the game is very good. trying way too hard to mimick nintendo. regretting the purchase.
that was about time
looks exactly the same as the first one. thanks, pass.
what about nintendo stating time and again that they are not part of the competition? this article makes zero sense.
this may be easily the best game of the decade.
not reading the review but judging from a 6.0 leaves the impression the blogger didn't get the game. or the learning curve may have been too steep for him/her. i am having great fun playing this game every day refining my tactics. definitely more fun than certain AAA titles. so, better luck next time reviewing a title.
newsflash: they don't publish these articles to inform us about our hobby. they are putting these articles out in the hopes that as many people as possible are clicking their articles for revenue. that's why the headlines are held as obscure as possible and the real info is hidden somewhere behind the click.
will it be the portstation 4 again until the end of the year? oh my...
very nice apologist article. last time i checked the switch sucked donkey balls. besides, i don't believe a rehash of a last gen game took the crown. maybe the original headline had an added "compared to wii u stuff". nintendo does not see the real manufacturers as competition neither do i accept them as a competitor.
uncharted 4: boring asf
horizon: repetitive asf
final fantasy 15: meh
no mans sky: lol
...
this list goes on. nearly all AAA titles i regretted buying this gen. and then there are many titles i couldn't even bother with... last guardian. this borne-thing, every fps and onlineshooters.
the only title that did not disappoint last year was xcom2 and that one i got for the pc because of dumb exclusivity for 6 months or 8.
sriously, i don't think DC is lucid enough to make sure there will be a proper videogame made out of their license. the first injustice sucked bigtime. so will this one. point of this review of a 9 being?
oh please stop, bloggers... i know "opinion" and all. but none of the real manufacturers have anything to worry about. the opposite is true: maybe the switch is in more trouble than any of its fans wants to admit.
some devs and pubs still haven't learned that quality stuff needs no protection. drop your less than stellar approach to game design and everybody and their mother is going to buy it. it is as easy as that.
but i know. this would require a proper approach to this business. which is inconvenient and expensive. better keep practicing your minimum input maximum ouput approach and bash these damn downloaders and keep protecting stuff. heaven forbid you'll have to admit ...
thanks for the heads up with this review. will stay away from this by all means.
thanks for pointing out this is a souls clone. will stay away as far as possible. thank god there is ark, otherwise this gen would really suck.
if only that gameplay every apologist is praising was available. nintendo's own titles and published titles are not an incentive anymore as they have become the epitome of stale. all i can see is the same crappy content as everywhere. and with this situation, i choose something more substantial than the lowest common factor in the gaming business.
so? it will be as repetitive as horizon? not really something to brag about, if you ask me. if you ask the gamers that only want solid graphics, the answer might differ.
uh.. and i was about buying it tonight. thanks for the heads up. a souls clone *shudder*
i didn't like the concept of destiny 1. i don't think i will buy a destiny 2.