core type features are dropped from every game, its a platform dependency, some platforms take more optimization than others because some have more processing time. the AI for instance, in pretty much every game is dumbed down to the lowest common denominator.
its a common practice in all software development fields, if you wanted this to stop youre out of luck, its going to keep happening. capcom made the right move here and didnt take it out of both versions, instead opting...
the bbb is not a government agency, its a non profit organisation, it cant penalize capcom in any way. all the BBB can do is tell people exactly what they already know, just how bad of a company they are. they collect complaints and if it gets too bad and the company doesnt take any initiative to fix it, they release those complaints to the public.
capcom isnt going to change anything because of this becasue theyre making money from it, the BBB cant stop capcom from doing any...
definitely, some games cost 100's of millions of dollars to develop and give a lot of content, others cost a few million and have 5 hours of gameplay with an online mode. both cost the same to the enduser. whats up with that? if companies can get the same amount of money without any dependency on the quality of their game then theyre not going to innovate and try and push boundaries for a better experience, theyre going to do the minimum amount of work for a game, continuing to push quali...
not to mention that the used game sales are a cheap way to get into a series of games. i bought a lot of games that were new ips at the time used and ended up buying all their sequels new. probably never would have even played any of them if it wasnt for the low price of the first game in the series.
definitely agree, consumers need something also, but recently the consumers have shown that theyre willing to get screwed out of certain things. i mean look at the things that some gamers are paying for the last couple of years. some of these things that people are actually paying for i never would have thought would be a paid for service
dang it looks fun, i wonder if/when they will be releasing in english
i would grab these but i already have too many games to play through, its been a good few months for my ps3
oh? are you going to pay for the bandwidth used? no? i didnt think so.
no, if a company can offer the same product at a lower price, that company should get the sale. publishers could offer incentives to buy new, and they do, but for the most part the incentives that they do offer are horrible for how much more you pay. things like pre order bonus' and such are just not cutting it, they need to offer all future DLC for free to people who buy their games new
lots of the prices need to be updated, you should email the companies who produced them to try and get their price dropped. sony cant drop another companies price in a digital market
if you think any particular prices are outside the normal, email the production/development companies about it. sony cant just change these prices, for instance if the individual producers tell sony that they want 27$ of every sale, sony moves around that price, generally never selling at a loss. sony are just the retailer here, they can recommend a price drop, but no one has to listen.
on another website (reddit if youre wondering) we organized a mass emailing to atlus about...
i feel like what i have now is just fine, not looking forward to spending money on a console that i would have spent on games.
theyre a company, theyre obligated to do whatever they think will make them the most money. if consumers act stupidly, ea will try and get more money out of them
if ea is evil people who buy their games are the ones to blame. you support them, they wouldnt do something if it lower their profits and they will fix things that their customers think is broken (as mass effect 3 ending shows)
companies arent evil, they almost always do exactly what anyone would exp...
should play through it a few more times, lots of different endings, all are satisfying
not sure why hes picking out jrpgs, character development is a difficult thing to do, especially with video games as the medium. not to mention that investing money into something like character development is a very risky move: its been shown that the majority of gamers only want to shoot things
guys, this, guys, listen, today i woke up, and guys, this is key listen to this part, guys, im going to figure out what sony did wrong. guys, this is going to be great, those people, who probably spend hundreds of thousands of dollars figuring out the best way to make money, guys, did i loose you? are you still listening guys? guys, ok, guys, im going to tell them, guys, im going to tell them that theyre doing it wrong. guys, this is such a good idea, right, guys? i mean, me, a journalist wit...
i could never take gears seriously. lots of enormous people walking around with huge chainsaw guns (i can only imagine him thinking of a gunblade and thinking, 'gunblade, PSHWA, GUNCHAINSAW') and tiny little peanut shaped heads.
cool shooter, but any story that was attached to it would have made me laugh just as much, the character design was the story, bunch of peanuts grew bodies and were fighting things, funny story
what i didnt like was other players coming and getting my game stuck on a quest that could never be completed
if its fun its fun, how long its in development shouldnt matter.
pretty soon all we're going to get are $60 pre orders for games that are half developed and if the game doesnt get enough pre orders it'll never get the patches to make it playable and everyone who pre ordered will be out $60
i mean, imagine if skyrim didnt sell many copies on the ps3: it would have never gotten an update to the gamebreaking memory issues that it had and all the people who bought it would have had a broken game.
these kinds of release...