i played through chrono trigger on my android, some of the simplest things were crazy difficult. touch screen only is just not an acceptable input medium. way too awkward and limiting
the top of my list is ps1 games and ps+ support for things like the cloud.
also, ps3 support with remote play
you probably already know, but you can play ps1 games through remote play. no i dont think its a good substitute, and i really hope sony gets ps1 support on there as soon as possible, but if you didnt know, i thought it would be helpful
it looks like this update was just to put in a few easily added things, nothing on that list took more than an hour to make.
QA is the bottleneck in these types of updates
when i buy a game new, i generally dont know what im getting, but thats ok, because if i dont like it i can take it back and trade it in for something else and only loose a few dollars, if i cant do this i probably wont be as many games. probably just start pirating... i mean i need to be able to demo a game somehow and with publishers deciding that demos arent worth it, well, i guess that doesnt leave many options.
to protect the world from devastation!
i think pc gaming is a great way to view the no-used-game-sales debate, for many pc games there are no used game sales because of an always on connection, and each game only allows one person to play per purchase, destroying used game sales.
some of these games, such as starcraft 2, have been out for about a year and are still $60. how can any publisher expect us to believe that they would lower the price on their games if they didnt have used sales taking their revenue when ...
meh, its probably a good idea, pc sales are a very big source of revenue for most games anyways, so they figure that theyre probably not loosing much.
if pc gamers want to be treated better they should start voting with their wallets. if only games with limited drm were bought, companies would start limiting the amount of drm in their games. if only games that were released on pc on same day as console were bought, they would start having concurrent release dates
no, business is business, if you think it will raise your stock, youre actually required by law to do it. as long as a company acts within the confines of the law, anything is fair game. religion? symbols? humanity? these are all just tools to the business world, a way to get your stock a tenth of a percent higher.
i usually listen to or learn music that makes me feel nostalgic, but this is cool too, i guess.
just wish versus would release within the year
i have no problem buying new, but when a game is selling for $20 used and $40 new, im definitely buying new. the market has spoken, the game is worth about $20, but youre still trying to get $40 for it? not to mention half the game was probably cut so that it could be sold as dlc later, making me pay even more. keep those practices up and ill never buy your game new, only buying the parts of the dlc that i want.
pretty neat idea
echhh, i was thinking about getting a 3ds for games like these
theyve already explained that microsoft little girl attitude is whats stopping them. you get what you pay for i guess... oh wait
vita is pretty much the only thing ive played since its launch, still have lots of games to play, most of the ones im playing right now are psp games though - i missed a lot of them
we've already had this conversation about 100 times before when xbox 3 was rumored to do the same thing
lot of jrpgs coming to ps3 lately, i excite
hes advertising for raptr, he probably doesnt actually think the stuff hes saying
but they wouldnt get any hits if they didnt put a game on their that everyone liked.
you see, they put a game that they know most people enjoyed and then everyone goes there to complain about how bad of a list it is, but they dont care how bad of a list is, they only care that you come to their site.
i got it, but ill probably never use it. funny how things like that work. got it with ps+ ... maybe sometime in the future ill edit a movie... maybe