To those complaining about damage (or lack there of), does it really take away from your experience? We've never had damage in any of the previous GT's but it never bothered me. I don't know, maybe it's just me, but when they announced damage for GT5 I looked at it as a nice bonus and that's it.
I don't know, I guess I feel differently than most gamers. I play the game and enjoy it as is. I try to master each game with whatever the developer provides. Did KZ2 feel different from most other shooters? Yes, it took more time to aim your weapon. Did it take away from my experience? No. I think most people who complained are the same folks who complain are those who want their aim to be the same as if you were running around and pointing at people with a stick. Don't get ...
LOL @Pedobear!
Should the next XBOX come with a blu-ray drive, all XBOX fanboys (including MS) will have a change of heart, just like they did with Kinect and motion controls.
Regardless of sales I think haters will find something, anything, to hate on. On the same token, regardless of sales, there will be many like myself who will be saying, "Just one more lap... Just one more win, then I'll go to bed..."
Yes we can!
I'll have to disagree with you folks disappointed with what was shown so far. Underneath it all, GT has always been and always will be about the race. GT fans will race to win on whatever track using whatever car available. Have I ever wished that certain cars/tracks were in the game? Yes. Did it make me disappointed with the game? No. Will GT5 be less than expected because it doesn't have ALL the cars and ALL the tracks with ALL the views using ALL the weather effects? Hell t...
Disappointing but can we really blame them? GT5 has mostly been about tuning up Japanese cars, and all the other cars were bonuses. I can see if PD promised every car but didn't deliver, but being disappointed that not ever car/track/effect you want is in the game seems a bit childish.
If you have confidence in your product then comparisons really don't bother you.
THE
Relax man, I understand your point. You're getting worked up for nothing. What it all means is moot point, and you explained why pretty well. Doesn't change the fact that Sony does not report ship=sold numbers. I just pointed out a simple observation.
Sony calculates their install base as 'sale-through'.
http://spong.com/article/19...
"We calculate our install base by 'sell through' and have done for the last four years I believe", we asked for a little additional clarification...
"We classify 'sell through' as the number of units consumers have actually pu...
Good feedback 8-bit. My hope that it get's better options AND more focus put back into core controller gaming for the 360.
My problem is it only does little of what it was being hyped to do and cost twice as much as it should, regardless of who it was intended for. Kinect is the hardware version of Vista.
This is why a BETA is so useful. Goes to show they are in it for the money, who gives a rip if it works properly or not. "All the great added features will give us a pass on the bugs and glitches!"
Only for PS3 hardware:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInf...
Page 6, below the sales chart:
"Beginning with Q1 FY07, the method of reporting hardware and software unit sales has been changed from production shipments to recorded sales."
Just thought I'd let you all know.
And you are must be the defender. Oh the irony.
I like both camps because they keep pushing each other and we end up with the best regardless. I've been running SLI for awhile and may continue just upgrade to a single 580. For now...
You obviously wasn't around in 2006-2008. Try looking up the past and see all the 'PS3 is teh DOOMED' articles posted EVERY DAY. This is what goes around coming back around.
I think we should all let the games speak for themselves and ignore the crap that is spewed from PR/Fanboys.