Bruh

You need help dude, like actual mental help, the fact that you keep stating this over and over again when no one cares is the definition of delusion

@vj27

There's literally no tech reason behind it, most GPUs support HDMI 2.0 and have drivers capable of delivering HDR, the reason for the lackluster support is because there simply isn't a large quantity of PC monitors that support HDR and even those don't support it properly, lack of UHD certified color space and so on.

Despite what N4G arm chair software engineers wanna say, most people do not hook up their PCs to TVs lol and so developer...

Yeah people said the same thing about Wolfenstein 2 or Shadow of War, but both of those offer a noticeable improvement over the Pro

Essentially you're first lick of next-gen visuals, real time Global Illumination will probably become a standard and an adaptive DOF effect will probably be toolkit as well. Not to mention a 4K 30 target for resolution and performance

Playstation the only console to get your

MLB, NBA and NFL fix.....also San Diego doesn't get enough recognition for the great work they do on the Show, hopefully we can get other sports titles out of them exclusively for the PS again, God knows we need a Madden competitor

The future looks amazing, but most probably for internal engines like id TECH, Naughty Dog, Northlight I could see next-gen move away from baked GI to fully real time GI solutions, seems like the most plausible leap. Northlight is an incredible engine as it already does this in Quantum Break, would love to see Remedy's next project on Xbox 2 or w.e

You're gonna buy a tech demo? lol

When its all said and done, i'd be a miracle if this game could even hit a 77 on Metacritic, don't think it'll be a commercial flop, but critically, seems to be the case.

As for my opinion, they lied out of their asses when they said the Beta was only 20%, there is def more content than in the Beta, but barely, seems like the Beta 70% of the content and the 30% we missed was end game stuff that was locked off. Mechanically works great with friends, but man the ...

Forza's only issue is their more catering towards casual fans, as the handling model isn't as penalizing and that is the only advantage GTS has over it

Duh...

I know the PS fanboys are dying inside and they'll say its got a more realistic handling and physics model. Which is true, but its marginal at best and it def doesn't offset the magnitude in difference in content between the two.Also if you need to buy a PS Plus membership to access 95% of the game....how is that worse than OPTIONAL loot boxes? lol

Don't believe a thing this loser says. GTS definitely is more realistic, but not by much. All of the car's in Forza understeer while GTS you can barely get a point steer oversteer as if every car is glued to the track. Both have their faults and both are sim-cade with GTS having a slight edge

@frosty

Which you can disable, GTS also has a ton of assist options, if you actually owned the game you'd know that but you're on here circle jerking with random fanboys

Its not " much more" realistic, damage is still ass and collision physics are terrible. The handling model is better and a much better FFB makes it seems a lot better. When in reality they both pale in comparison to Asseto and PC2

I have on a 49" KS 8000, presentation isn't the issue. I don't think I ever criticized it. The issue here in is with content, technically and mechanically I think its fine. Its not as satisfying as PC2 with a wheel, but much better than FM7. But a bare bones SP, barely any cars and 6 real world tracks? Come on now, don't accept this BS

Sitting at a 78 Meta, so critically the worst among the racing titles this year. For obvious reasons, content is key in a racing title as its what brings variety and play time to the game. Sony fanboys want you to think that only 160 cars is amazing because they are so detailed it seems like the rest of the competition makes their cars from stock photos on a Google search. When in reality PC2's car sounds are light years ahead and FM7 actually has interior lighting in all of their 700 car...

Simple
On N4G: GTS ( cause PS or die b**itches)

In Real Life: FM7 ( its higher rated and also has WAY more content)

Always see this on N4G, with very little actual comment aside from some fanboy BS. GTS does have the better handling model and physics. But its a marginal difference...its still not at the level of PC2, AC, iRacing, RaceRoom etc.

Most hardcore-sims on console ( PC2, Asseto) are crap with a controller because the level of accuracy and control you want with the car is not physically possible without a wheel. These games aren't for casual gamers in mind they're for enthusiasts. That being your point basically reiterates mine which is GTS's physics aren't on par with PC2 and AC, albeit in your case you like it as its playable with a controller. But to say GTS is better because its better on a controller i...

5 Years in Development and ONLY 6 REAL WORLD TRACKS....the game promises a focus on e-sports based "real racing" yet doesn't even encompass a track list that SMS has beaten in their first game with a MUCH smaller budget. Not to mention the racing physics aren't even on par with PC2 or AS or iRacing...its a marginal step from FM7. There's no excuse to the comprises made against other racing titles on the market.

Missed opportunity for sure, but damn it...

@Silly

But I'm not lol I'm simply saying its an off ball review, you seem a lot more emotionally worked up than I am