Did any1 see the RAGE product placement gameplay in Breaking Bad? Looks great, though it isn't a rail shooter lol.
True, it's a corridor area, but the graphics are very nice.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
@ghaleon1980
he's right though
this ^
EA are just rubbing it in because BF genuinely is better and they know it.
I do prefer the gunplay in CoD but theres a lot more to it than that.
jaosobno pretty much has it right tbh.
MW3 seems like it could a fairly good game, deffo better than BO and MW2.
But I'm not going to buy any map packs for it, if I even buy it at all.
Having just 13 maps is silly, considering only about 5 of them will even be any good (if previous CoD games are anything to go by).
I felt shivers in my spine watching the Pistol being used :P
But if none of the money from a purchase of the remake goes to Bungie then I will not be buying it. If 343 need to make a new engine for halo 4,5,6 then I am not expecting the games to feel anywhere near as good as traditional Halos because they won't have the full original team who were no doubt important to the game's full success - look what happened to FF when a lot of staff left after the Enix merge, an...
I felt shivers in my spine watching the awesome Pistol being used :P
A lot of devs who are new to the f2p model don't do it right. They have to make microtransactions in such a way that does not affect core gameplay, the way that Riot have made them work in LoL (probably the world's most successful F2P game). The new Age of Empires is a total joke, on the oher hand, because the microtransaction content costs more than a full $60 game every 3 months.
what he said ^
But it isn't properly viable in the console market because of the large development costs, they have to charge max price in the hope that a lot of people will blindly buy it because of their aggressive TV advertising campaign; which sadly works quite well. Though that method has brought some good series to existance like Gears, Infamous and Assassin's Creed (AC1 was the most successful new IP ever to appear on consoles because it was heavily marketed an...
Skyrim is going to have less content and less gameplay time than Oblivion did, because it is offering a much larger portion of its disk space to higher resolution textures - that is just a fact and it was blatently proven with Oblivion and GTA4 when compared to Morrowind and San Andreas.
Many games last gen had a LOT more content in them (san andreas...). Because they were also limited by DVD but the individual game assets were far smaller in size.
And PC gam...
both versions?
It's 1 disk.
They took the content out of all 3 versions so it will fit on a silly 9GB dvd of course, otherwise M$ would get angry at them.
"That scares me slightly then, as a game the size of skyrim should be more than one disk on the 360"
They make it have hardly any content:
Morrowind before Oblivion.
San Andreas before GTA4.
Pattern?
Open world games can't exactly be multi-disk, so they have to skimp out on gameplay.
so true
mhm...
People don't seem to notice that there are indeed smartphones that are more powerful than vita.
But that doesn't matter, they still don't have proper tactile buttons so they are no use at all for decent games.
Though they will have a lot more games overall because Android is an open platform, there will still be very few that proper gamers will be interested in and those will likely be on Vita/3DS too.
Noti...
hell, I could build a gaming PC for the price of an iPad 2 >_<
Apple need to go and die in a fire
what they said ^
people don't know what /s means on here, they read the first few words and instantly disagree + downbubble usually.
I won't be worrying; I'm getting it on PC.