Hmm...
I liked the library (it was a good change of pace) and the shadow temple.
Cortana was damn annoying on Legendary, but come on - think about some CoD levels on Veteran if you want to talk about annoying cheap difficulty (grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, grenade, gr...
PC has more exclusives per year than 360 and ps3 exclusives combined
lol 1 bub
lol @ this coming from a manufacturer who wont bundle a good GPU with a rig unless you buy an over the top CPU too, and they claim to retail gaming machines :/
Money grabbing retailers like Alienware are the reason people think PC gaming is very expensive.
Headlong is my fav.
It's very good for sneaking about behind enemy lines.
A lot of people hate it, I'm not sure why.
I still prefer the tone of the Morrowind one. (I'm not using this vid as comparison lol).
It might be because I have 500 hours of it embedded in my brain :/
what a horrible, horrible site.
Good thing I wasn't gonna buy D3 anyway. (don't want another penny of mine ever going towards Activision who "merged" with Blizzard)
Though I can't see why diablo would have to be different so it could be multiplat... I can imagine that they would somehow break the PC version because they have essentially already secured a consumer base on PC simply by being 'Blizzard' (Activision now, remember). They don't have to prove themselves like DICE ...
Hmmm... not allowing catwoman levels to be played might actually be illegal here in the EU or the UK.
They are legally allowed to lock out multiplayer because it is a service and not technically part of the product. If it is contained on the disk, they have no justification to disallow it's use by the legal owner of the physical product (somehow they get away with that with DLC that resides on the disk). I can't exactly imagine there being a court case over it though ...
99% of comparison articles are that bad.
Lol @ lens of truth's heavilly JPEG compressed and downscaled screenshots. Then they pretend to understand graphics termanology lol.
Yeah it was just a lack of tweaking on the part of some of their graphics programmers or texture artists, or management moved them onto something else before they could polish their work (regularly happens in large game development studios).
Oblivion had that problem on some PCs and fallout NV had the probelm on 360. Would have thought bethesda would have addressed the problem :/ but they are similar to Dice in that if a bug/issue doesn't destroy the game then there is no...
I always said RAGE didn't look particularly good from all those screenshots that were floating around. People on here downrated me even though the textures were clearly low res and the models clearly had less polygons than many other games. And there were so few characters or other dynamic objects on screen.
Even maxed out on PC it looks worse than UC and a bunch of other console games, everything except the AA you can force on in your graphics control panel; but thats no...
That's what I was thinking.
There's so much focus on graphics all the time the devs often ditch gameplay, story, characters, setting, feel etc. due to the pressures of the marketplace, their publishers and development resources.
So few good games this console generation, UC is up there at the top with little competition (there are some other amazing games this gen, but none compared to last gen or the gen before that).
CoD elite renamed.
Die in a fire Activision, stop ruining great developers.
I wonder if I can hack battlelog to let my PC version join servers for console gamers.... lolz
They probably use the same networking protocol and provide some kind of version ID... packet capture ftw.
Consoles have deserved dedicated servers for too long, P2P networking is just bad most of the time.
TBH, if I was getting the 360 version I would probably opt out of the HD texture pack to see if the frame rates were more stable. Can't remember the last console FPS I played and didn't experience fps dips and/or stuttering because they are trying to render something that the hardware can't actually achieve stably (probably something from last gen like timesplitters).
I'm all for lower graphics if the game runs smoother. Bioshock had an option along those line...
ur last bubble too bahabeast8619
-bubs for personal attack on all ur posts btw
u mad bro?
"it is BETTER to install hence why they said it is mandatory"
http://dictionary.reference...
Whoever said mandatory in the first place was incorrect, because no 360 game can be launched if the install is mandatory (MS won't license it).
On another note. Installing a game would generally save time overall on any platform because of the shorter load times....
Very pretty.
If they do what DICE did and have an optional (but recommended) normal res (not high res, that only really applies to pc and a few ps3 games) texture pack install for 360 then they wouldn't have to hold back on content like they may have done with GTA4.
I am expecting GTA5 to have the amount of awsome in it that San Andreas did. GTA4 had car modding in the engine and there were buildings catered for it but it wasn't implemented fully as a gameplay feature. So they cle...