bothebo

Member
CRank: 5Score: 39280
4414d ago
4414d ago
4414d ago

Bring Birth by Sleep to the Vita:
http://forums.eu.square-eni...

4414d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol why? What is the logic in this? You're hardware is already struggling so you're releasing more hardware that makes it a cheap home console instead of a powerful handheld? I cannot understand Sony at all in regard to the Vita none of the steps they have taken make much sense in the long run.

4415d ago 3 agree28 disagreeView comment

Could not agree more with this article. One big game will change it all for the Vita: just one. Even if Sony were to pay a 3rd party $20 million dollars to create a great game for the Vita they would certainly get their money back. It's a shame they haven't done it yet but hopefully E3 will have the title Vita: Episode 4 A New Hope. God I hope rumors of an inFamous and exclusive AC come true, we need it so badly.

4416d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView comment

Tearaway is a phenomenal game but if you like JRPGs then you have FFX HD remake coming your way in March and Toukiden on February 11th. Also, have you tried Soul Sacrifice? It's a very good JRPG that is similar to Monster Hunter but instead you special powers with elemental attributes.

4416d ago 9 agree3 disagreeView comment

It's refreshing to read your comments lol. A good example is Sly Cooper Thieves in Time which according to vgchartz has only sold 70,000 copies on the Vita, but over 300,000 copies on the PS3. Why pay for a game that will not have all the features and water downed graphics? The Vita needs its own games and big name exclusives will probably boost sales. For instance, why hasn't Bioshock Vita happened yet when it will without a doubt move hardware and put the Vita in a better position i...

4417d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol thank you!! 2D side scrolling games do not move hardware and they add little value to the system. In my opinion Sony needs to provide "incentives" for companies to come onto the Vita. Think about it: if they pay a 3rd party $20 million to make a big game for the Vita and it reaches lifetime sales of 2 million they get their money back. I think Sony gets 25% of revenue from developers because its their platform. 40(2000000) is $80 million so they would get their money back. Digit...

4417d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Thank you..... remote play is a cool feature but is it worth $200? Probably not.

4417d ago 13 agree11 disagreeView comment

@iamsuperman

You're an idiot for thinking that will work. How are hardware sales in the last week for the Vita proving your theory? The PS4 is out but Vita hardware sales have returned to normal levels. How are gamers going to be enticed to buy a $200 HARDWARE accessory for a $400 piece of HARDWARE. YOU BUY HARDWARE FOR SOFTWARE NOT HARDWARE FOR HARDWARE. For instance, you're using Chrome, Mozilla, Safari etc. right now, you are not using a tablet that is having your...

4419d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I like your earlier comment, so I'll respond to this one so you get a notification. I think the way Sony has handled the Vita in the West has been egregious. They need more software like the 3DS: PEOPLE BY HARDWARE TO USE SOFTWARE. It's that easy!

4429d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Good numbers for God Eaters 2

4430d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

Don't see any reason why anyone will buy this when you can get it for less on the PS3.........

4430d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

But you're getting less for your money.

4433d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Interesting but I think the author should have taken into consideration the medium from which kids are being introduced to games nowadays such as iPhones and other mobile devices. Furthermore, some of these arguments and points are loosely connected but others are spot on.

I'd also argue that the PC library has always been more diverse than console libraries because more than one company will make software available on it: Steam, Origin. Additionally, a market that is be...

4433d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

If you're a not a PS Plus member i'd strongly recommend you buy that. You get games for free and they're switched out every couple of months so you always have the opportunity to play more games. As for the future, well I'm in the same boat as you. I'd wait till E3 and if Sony shows that it has nothing coming for the Vita at that point, I'd debate selling it too. Just hang on to it for a little bit longer.

4435d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Could not disagree with you more. What are you actually doing when you buy hardware? You're buying access to software....you do not buy hardware to buy more hardware. Why do you buy a computer? Not to say you own a computer BUT TO USE IT.

Indies will not help the Vita. Indies only help deliver small games aimed at making profit to a system that costs $200 and is promised as a console experience. Flower is the only remarkable indie game at the moment on the Vita. I have pl...

4435d ago 7 agree5 disagreeView comment

That's kind of pessimistic. I'd like to think they're doing it to keep the cost of the bundle down, but who really knows. All I'm saying is 4GB is not enough.

4439d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Good job Sony! A 4GB memory card probably won't be enough, but it's still a great deal.

4439d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment