Most of the PS3 mouse/keyboard controllers have been nothing more than hack jobs, and like all hack jobs they don't work particularly well. So unless the mouse really track and move like a mouse I'm staying the hell away from this one.
I'm looking forward to this game too. But in order for me to buy a game on release date in this economy it must satisfy three conditions.
1. Must have multiplayer.
2. Is a RPG that I can spend a hundred hours playing (Skyrim).
3. If not 1 or 2 then I must be able to buy it at a considerable discount.
Thats why I'm skipping this game in favor of BF3 and Uncharted 3. I'll buy it next year from a Steam sale, but it'll have to be a...
Is that Michael Keaton in that costume? He's kinda short...
Best analogy, ever.
Steam is the Amazon of the digital market place. The lesson here is that you have to go all out. There must be a platform for community and customer reviews, and the sales must be frequent and compelling.
You can not do this when you have one foot in both retail and digital space because their interests will collide. This is a lesson learned by Barnes and Noble and Blockbuster. Next up to get schooled, Origin.
Even if he does it would be completely irreverent. He'll be a guy who's playing as a digital character, recommending a guy who's going to be playing a character, of another guy who is playing a digital character. LOL.
My PC was build to handle everything BF 3 throw at it, so it should rip through this light weight at lighting speed on ultra.
DX 9? LOL! Oh hai 2006.
I wonder what his reaction will be when the critics rip Twisted Metal apart.
It wold be nice to have some numbers.
I bet nobody outside of the PC world gives a single shit about this game. But because the dev made a remark regarding the "weakest platform" the fanboy swarmed all over it.
Thats what the 360 version looks like? God damn that looks good. Can't wait to see this on my PC.
I brought mine from Amazon for $50. For $10 less I'm willing to wait until it arrives tomorrow.
I don't want to see a damn thing unless it's on the nextgen console.
People play BF3 single player?
Why?
Disagrees, I guess not!
This is Bi-Failing.
1. Failing to read the article before commenting.
2. Failing to read the god damn title before commenting.
It's as if Lugia 4000 stop reading at Battlefield 3 PC: Graphics before spewing some canned knee jerk reaction.
I'm not sure if I should give or take bubbles for the most obscure and out of left field Sean Penn reference ever in a gaming post.
It doesn't matter how it's used when there haven't been a console with enough memory in the history of gaming. Sony thought the PS3's 512 MB would be heaps of memory until they found out that it can barely run Home, play a MMO, or even have in game chat.
Now they know better. The nextgen of consoles should be able to seamlessly run Home in the background while playing BF 4 with 128 players while running various "apps" at the same time. If you put 2 ...
Nothing less than 2 GB is acceptable, and maybe even 4 GB. At 1 GB the nextgen console would come out of the gate with as much RAM as a cell phone. That's pathic.
Conquest should only be played with 64 players. Even at 30 there's not enough people on the ground to get the feeling that you're in a battle instead of a small 4 vs 4 skirmish.