like first i have to admit, i bought gold with move, but only played few minutes. now that i started playing for real, my opinion completely changed.
game sucks, clumsy people, small spaces, your heros back covers half the screen, while your partner usually stands right in front of you to cover the rest. standing still while aiming and clumsiest controls ever nailed the rest of the nails into its coffin. non-gold edition 1/10
game was so terrible i didn't...
since he is from UK... anywhere else in EU maybe?
if he is in a good physical condition he could maybe even swim to get his game;)
every game that required fw update had that update on the disc. sometimes you even got never released version (Ratchet: ToD, i think). where later publicly released version was higher than one deployed on disc
it is just your brains inability to process that information.
some ps3 were simply bought for math server/cluster. there simply is no way in hell to get so cheap and fast cluster. even i used one for that. same pc cluster would be 10 times more expensive. those machines run in text mode and no game will ever cause problems as no one is playing on them.
desktop linux on the other hand was unusable where you could get far better with cheap pc.
that allows you to block content where subtitle contains "..."
not that i hate NT, HS was awesome, Enslaved not so much. but quantity of NT news is starting to cover 1/3rd of news lately. in fact so many (mostly stupid) news about NT i'm starting to hate that company.
lol, i'm coding my self and i can tell you one thing. maybe on your planet, not on this one where the rest lives;)
most of the time demo is pre-alpha and release usually still has bugs which would at best make it beta in real world. everyone does that. you simply can't wait to get every bug out before showing it off or you simply need money badly and need to roll out unfinished product which will be better after you do some patching afterwards.
making...
if you look more carefully, rocks, ground and such. ps3 employs quality texture and blur while xbox employs mostly noised rendered ones. for some textures i really like what xbox version does, some textures look way better than ps3 ones (like rock under his feet on second picture). and some textures just get annoyingly noisy getting much better treatment on ps3.
kinda draw in my book. both versions look good and after you do the aftermath that during gameplay you don't st...
lol at your reasoning. i (for example) bought the game only to see how it was done.
i don't care about FPS, but i still bought Resistance 1&2 (to support Insomniac work on Ratchet, and that support probably went byebye. no more Ratchet) and KZ2 (to see graphics). none of those were not finished more than 2-3 levels into the game. games like Halo, CoD, HL, MoH, BBC... can exists, i don't even care if i see them or not. i don't have any wish to play or see them ...
congratulations, you've won the "most uninformed comment ever" award
emulation in real world? not on mine... if you have PC, try emulating PPC on it (use PearPC) and tell me how usable that is. now consider those two architectures don't differ much, at least they share same family as "general purpose processors" which translates into "jack of all trades", aka. can do everything decent, but has no specialization.
Cell is s...
maybe 29/30 of the world population is (this equates to world - NA), internet is provided all over the world.
your comments just make US citizens look stupid. i'm willing to bet your (only you two included here) world map has NA and rest is all colored red with large white writing "THERE BE DRAGONS!"
except textures, you described CoD as far as my taste goes;)
most of the software (at least 80-90%) can be the same if you use same engines. and even in case of different engines one can still make his own wrapper which is compiled differently per platform.
the thing that differs completely are things like memory managers, thread handling and how you built your architecture. another thing is load handling. usually that is a really small portion of the game code (but heavily defines final quality) that can sometimes be handled by tweaki...
fuck, I hit agree by mistake, now i need to clarify
yes, i'm coding for life and i can tell you most coders are lazy. something has to become really, really needed to step into it and it helps if their lives depend on it.
i remember how lazy adoption of xml was in commercial desktop software. all the people i knew were using old and clumsy approach (either database or some binary file) few years after it was starting to get wide adoption. no matter how mu...
as much as i prefer uc1 gameplay wise. getting on the top of the hotel and looking at the city floored me down. abnormal draw distance with most stunning view ever in any game.
second thing that floored me down were physics on the train. damn, i could almost feel the real train shaking and every curve blended so wonderfully into movement.
castelvania looks wonderful, i mean really wonderful. but, compared to uc2 still crap
"You thought Heavenly Sword combat was GOOD?
An one-button mashing no-skill-or-thought required game, FUN?
...C'mon, bro."
clearly, ?bro? you never played on hard. your comment tells that.
normal was just like you say. probably even a bit easier (except Kai levels)
but hard? you couldn't get trough minute of first level mashing your button. making counter on enemy? damn right impossible (t...
damn, you sounded serious until this. I too agree UC2 is downgrade from UC1 (only gameplay and story wise, everything else is whole new level of greatness).
but.... short???
he played demo like most of us. mediocre graphics, bad animation, lamest almost on the rail platforming possible and really lame combat (after making awesome combat in Heavenly Sword i kinda can't figure out how they could make Enslaved such downgrade).
Enslaved was day1 purchase for me (after HS i was hyped for new NT game), until they made mistake and gave demo before launching. now this game fell into "buy used for under 20eur" category in my plans
anything but boss battles. and less killing more exploring if possible.
while killing doesn't bother me so much, boss battles and their randomness pissed me off. uc1 and the enemy waves were much better and required you giving your best. uc2 boss battles were requiring 99% of luck and 1% of non sense (I almost felt like fighting final boss in R&C:ToD without groovytron). if they really do boss battles again, then best thing ND can do is explore how well DS implemented...
same goes for their operating system. before launch promising holly grail of features later shown as cancelled or rehashed old ones.
they are promising object file system from time of NT3.51. in real life... they still barely produce archaic crap like NTFS.
vista had so much promises, but in the end it is rehashed XP. while 7 is nothing but (as i hear, at least done really good) vista+service pack looking and having completely different majorly to avoid any c...
i'm so buying this game for Move day1. and this reviewer simply rocks. his analysis of MAG and this one is awesome