I'll put the head of a dead Geth Colossus in his bed as a warning.
Oh and if 360 version is 2 discs, expect the same for PC one. It was the same with Mass Effect 2.
The thing I'm not getting is why is this a CE and day 1 DLC? It's absurd. It should either come with the game on the disc or if they're greedy, just be an online pass exclusive DLC like Zaeed: Price Of Revenge from Mass Effect 2. I mean making a very important character that MUST be in the game a DLC and then selling it for 10 bucks on day 1 while adding two shallow as hell characters to the main game (yes, I'm looking at you James Vega and Diana Allers) is just absurd.
There goes my bowel control.
Edit: Oh and Codeman420:
"Project engineers for the latest Metal Gear Solid targeted for high-end consoles and PC"
http://www.konami.jp/kojima...
Yep...
Joined 12 days ago and claims ME 3 isn't an RPG. Shocker... Oh and multiplayer portions of Dead Space 2 and Bioshock 2 were horrible and unncessary. Mass Effect 3's multiplayer is incredibly addicting and fun an it's co-op only. So don't use those two games as an excuse to throw mud at ME3 co-op.
His previous masterpieces like Policenauts and Snatcher BEGS to differ. He can make masterpieces if he wants to and if he has the time.
Couldn't have said it better. Agreed with everything except what you've said about ME 2 since I still think being able to give decisions of certain magnitude makes an RPG an RPG and not the other elements found in them. But still, very well said. It's good to know that there are people here that aren't afraid to voice their negative opinions against popular games.
"BioWare has released a gameplay movie from Mass Effect 3 with Coop gameplay on Noveria."
Misleading as hell. Goddamn crappy third grade websites...
What a load of crap. Halo: Reach is at number 2 while Shadow Of The Colossus is at 24? Seriously? Reach had one of the single worst storylines I've ever seen. It was predictable from midway to the finale while Shadow Of The Colossus had a shocking ending that made you question your motives. And Modern Warfare 2? Seriously? A goddamn half assed and unsatisfying cliffhanger is deserved to be number 3? Hell most of the games listed there had crap or just mediocre endings. Games like Portal 1...
Enlighten us then. What Mass Effect is really about? Is it about having 600 points to spend on your skills and finding the slightly altered version of the same armor or weapon you've found two hours ago from an enemy or is it about choices and their impacts on not just the game itself but its sequels and the character development? Oh and don't you ever get sick of writing the same crap to every Mass Effect 3 related article over and over again?
"Now they added an unnecessary multiplayer to please the casual crowd, because that's all Mass Effect is now."
Talk about excessive bias... Have you even tried the multiplayer demo? It's amazing. Hell, it's even better than the Gears horde mode eventhough demo puts you against Cerberus only and on 2 maps. And if they added it to please the casual crowd then they've failed miserably because if you're playing on Silver or Gold difficulty then you...
"2. Not enough dialogue choices"
Seriously? It's a frigging demo that takes place in two random sections of the game for God's sake. How can someone make this assessment out of a demo that's obviously made to demonstrate the action aspect of the game and call themselves a journalist?
Same thing was present in Mass Effect 2 demo too. And no it is not. Do NOT trust the demos of Mass Effect games and give the full games a chance. Third one especially going to have lots of emotional moments according to developers and voice actors.
Not to mention the "DLC" that comes with most of the stuff is actually just Reinforcement packs that you can get in MP with your in,game credits rather than buying an 80 dollar butt-ugly statue. The editor even spelled the Kingdoms Of AMALUR wrong.
Yeah because having the "option" to choose between three different styles is a horrible thing...
/s
"I think it's great ME3 gives so much freedom and choice on how you play the game."
This. But of course since this is Mass Effect 3, intelligent crowd of N4G will find another way to trash it too. They were complaining about fewer customization options in ME 2. Bioware added more to the game with ME 3 yet they're still complaining even when they haven't played the game. They were complaining about the inclusion of multiplayer. I've, alongside most of...
Holy crap! Now these are the games that they should be releasing on PSN as PS2 classics instead of those crappy Disney games for little girls.
Well, most of the "top 10 bosses" articles already had bosses from MGS and God Of War games in them so this list is actually feels fresh for a change. But I'd replace Tower Knight with False King Allant since that bastard was much harder to kill than Tower Knight. Especially if you consider how Tower Knight was a pushover when you used ranged attacks.
And the ads... Oh those goddamn ads... EVERYWHERE!
You are right. But be honest, what would you do if your closest friend or one of your family member commited a major crime and you get blamed with them because of their actions? The most appropriate thing for most people to do would be to lay low, at least for a while. Do you think Citadel Fleet would let a Geth Ambassador's ship to pass through their defenses eventhough their intentions aren't evil? And to your second question, I think Geth just didn't want to involve in anything...
If they were greedy, they would've made this an online pass DLC rather than a frigging day 1 and CE included one. What they're doing is just pathetic. Why do I have to pay 10 bucks to get a "very important" squadmate that should've been in the game from the get go? It really is pathetic to see shallow piece of crap characters like James Vega and Diana Allers makes it into the retail game but not this one.