hasn't that thing been in dev. forever?
article is talking about the 360. so why not compare it to it's next-gen counterpart: the ps3. look at both systems and decide which one is built better. this is the question AT PRESENT.(if it makes you feel better to rant about the ps2; ok, but it doesn't change the widely held belief that the 360 is most unreliable piece of electronics out there - past or present.)
and your comment about sony tvs? i'd love to know what you're basing that on?? pioneer won't be the king of an...
i'll allow any reviews from any site........(wind blowing)...........that's what i thought.
look at the bright side: since 360 has no games worth playing coming out, your system can't RROD on you.
and i never pay more than 20 dollars. and some i get for as little as 14.
but for the movies that are must have (for me) i'll pay best price i can find. recently announced LoR trilogy coming to blu is one example of paying whatever i have to pay.
not that it matters to me, but i read and watch lots of news of all kinds. i've never heard or read(as fact) any of the stuff this guy is saying. and, ps2 has been recognized as what made the dvd format so popular. i will agree that lower priced stand-alone players should be expected before end of the year.
what happened to actual news on this site? seeing entirely too many opinion pieces like this.
i think COD series is a little over-rated; so, i don't think it matters who makes it. BIA:HH looks to be a much better game than COD4. and resistance 2 and gears 2 even better than that.
why do 360 fans defend the game for being so difficult? isn't that what difficulty settings are for? and why don't you same fans rip every other 360 game for not having the same difficulty?
i just don't get it. it doesn't take a skilled dev to turn up difficulty or speed of game. but that doesn't automatically mean a game will be good. for ex.-if game is too fast for camera to keep up with it; how is this good balance of gameplay and camera?
just some thoughts.
i don't like it and won't use it unless game dicatates i have to.
why would devs show any of the new stuff so early? i can't wait to get my hands on this game.
i'm not sure i understand the comment about enemies looking the same....?
i'm in minority, but COD4 was fun, but only stood out in multi-player. and that was offset by the painfully linear and short single-player campaign.
NG and Haze are out and were overhyped. why don't you wait till KZ2 is out to make this determination. point about the article is that they seem biased against the game.(just like eurogamer seemed biased against MGS series when reiviewing MGS4) the rest of what you said is not based on fact; only opinion. and since other sites loved the demo, we'll just have to wait and see.
what the f#ck are they talking about???
keep preaching the truth brother!
please,please,please,please,pl ease
i'm getting it on the 12th. i preordered as soon as gamestop would let me. can't pick it up till 1pm though. i have a business lunch.(but after that i'm taking a 1/2 day off and heading home.)
kojima, we gamers truely are not worthy.
mad because itagaki isn't smart enough to pull off something like that?
both are funny jokes.
i can't believe that MS is serious? it's been out almost 3 years; the time for gaining even modest respectability in Japan is long gone.
i can't imagine MS ever sending their next console(x720?) there.