No, its not different. It changes the settings of certain aspects of the game to increase the difficulty.
If that's not a difficulty setting I don't know what is.
Game has hard setting is news?
Geez, must be a slow news day.
I bet Microsoft will insist on making it Gold only so you end up paying twice, I feel really bad for people who only have a 360 those guys are getting ripped off where these streaming services are concerned.
@Baka-akaB
Its not obvious that you know it and perhaps you should calm down a bit? I mean if you make a comment expect people to respond to it.
Also FFXIII wasn't ok, it was utter dross that involved one long walk and that played itself.
That was developed by the Eidos part of the company, the Square Enix part hasn't produced anything of any worth since FFX.
This has to be the most idiotic comment on this subject that I've seen.
@Saladfax
Way to miss the point mate.
DRM, lack of control over what I do with my purchases, inability to lend my games to my friends and no way of renting all suggest that the download only model is designed, not with the consumer in mind, but with the publisher as the primary beneficiary. If the market goes download only, I'll find a different hobby and the same goes for movies as well.
Of course if you're happy to bend over and t...
I will stop gaming when I can't buy physical disks.
I will never buy a download only console, I want my boxed games and I want my disks.
Lets ground this in reality with facts for a moment, what is your evidence for Autumn 2013?
By evidence I mean actual facts and not stuff in your head that you've made up.
How plain can MS be? They's categorically denied anything will be announced about the next XBOX at E3.
No tech demo, no hints, no hardware, no games- nothing.
The only thing worse than MS squashing rumours about E3 2012 announcement for the next XBOX is all the bloody articles reporting the rumours of a 2013 announcement. Seriously, the next gen isn't going to start until 2014 at the earliest- get used to it.
For "rumour" read "made up crap".
This depends on what the content is, if this is skins and models that are used in multiplayer then it makes sense to have it on the disk. If it wasn't there and if you were playing with someone who has the DLC, and who is using the skin/model in your game, you wouldn't be able to see the person you're playing with.
If not then it's blatant profiteering.
No, Namco Bandai did with Beautiful Katamari.
you failz
People are becoming more price sensitive because everyone is worried about their jobs, launching new hardware isn't going to rectify this.
Basically people are tightening belts and entertainment is a flexible part of people's budgets and video games are expensive, especially when you have publishers trying to wring every last penny out of us with DLC.
Also I think publishers are also reaping the 'benefits' of their policy of locking off cont...
While I'm personally sick of publishers ripping us off for DLC there are valid reasons why some DLC content needs to be on disk. DLC that contains characters that can be played online would need character models on disk so your console would be able to render the model on your screen.
The other bits though are ridiculous,
Thanks you and other people who buy this content have helped to condemn us all to years of being ripped off by publishers who'll take your action as a green light to further screw us all over for content that should be part of the main game.
*slow clap*
Do you have secret homosexual urges?
Science says you do:
http://www.scientificameric...
;o)
Being a PC fanboy doesn't make you any less of a douche.