I think everyone knows they are coded on PC, the difference is that a lot of games are made from the ground up using 360/PS3 specs in mind, so textures, draw distance, etc are only what they can handle. A lot of games are then 'ported' to the PC. The PC version is not changed, so it still has textures, draw distance etc. that were designed for the 360/PS3 and are not taking full advantage of PC hardware like Dice are doing.
What a bad article. PSN rarely goes down and the downloads from the store are just as fast as LIVE. And feature rich on xbox? What? In game chat is the only thing I can think of that affects in game, and you can talk to your squad on PS3 and that's the only thing that matters, what a stupid excuse.
And 'PC that costs thousands' is a total derp on the authors behalf. I bought a PS3 and a PC when the PS3 was first launched. Both cost the same amount of money and to ...
I was stating that it will look like consoles, which is still good. My PC will be close to maxing it out, I was just stating a point. And no, I do not care about beating consoles. I own all 3 consoles and a PC and I play whatever I like on them, I enjoy good graphics but I will play games with crap graphics as long as they are fun.
Recommended is to play the game at pretty high graphics with a good framerate, you don't need anywhere near that to play at low/medium graphics with 30 FPS, which I'm 'assuming' will be what the PS3/360 will look like. So people don't really have to upgrade, only if they want it to look the best as possible which I'm assuming a lot of people won't care to much about.
Brainwashed....about the truth? I don't think anyone who has a normal IQ could honestly believe, and prove, that the PS3 is more powerful than a PC. I would say it's more the people who believe otherwise that are brainwashed...
It doesn't matter where you live or how good your internet is, if you connect to someone on the other side of the world from shit matchmaking you are going to lag a lot. CoD has always been bad with matchmaking, even after they state that they fix the problem.
The NEED dedicated servers in each countries, then put in a server browser so people can look at their ping to each server and then decide from that which one they want to connect to.
Having user ho...
It will start behind where the PC will be at that stage anyway. If top of the line PC's cost (for an example) $1000 the PS4 is going to have to cost the same amount, not to mention the PS4 will be as BIG as a PS4 or it is going to overheat like crazy. And then as soon as new graphic cards and CPUs come out the PS4 will be behind yet again.
With the way that technology is rapidly getting better, the PS4 is going to want to have some sort of feature to install new graphic c...
It's because of a little thing that has been around for many years called 'money'.
You don't make a $50 million budget on a brand new IP from a new studio to 'hope' that it sells well. Companies would go bankrupt and be in mass dept.
Other companies can afford the budget, but know their game will sell well whether they put in amazing graphics or not, *cough* MW3 *cough*.
There are other reasons such as putting out games faster...
...I don't believe so. I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure BF3 was planned to be on the PC the entire time. Maybe you read one of the many articles on N4G that take a few words and make a new sentence out of it that does not resemble what was said at all.
Your 'source' doesn't mention anywhere that 24 frames is the MAX the human eye can detect. Anything UNDER 24 frames is easily detected by the eye and doesn't give a smooth look. The eye can detect up to about 80 FPS before the framerate starts to look the same.
Look at the bellow link, the eye can easily detect the difference between 30 and 60 FPS, however 30 isn't BAD so BF3 being 30FPS on consoles will not matter at all.
5274d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment
...What?
Seriously, what was that meant to mean? Battlefield 3 is coming to PC so I'm slightly confused, or are we all going to NASA to play BF3?
@MidnytRain
So how come I can view it? I don't have a twitter...
I agree, totally weak argument. I do most of my gaming on PC, but when I play games on my PS3/360 the frame rate doesn't change to much, it certainly isn't the reason I would or wouldn't buy a game.
Maybe Activision should stop putting so much time into bragging about 60 FPS and make it so their matchmaking works on consoles. I can't think of how many times I have seen Americans and Australians put into a game together. Who cares if the game runs smoothly if y...
How does crap like this get approved? This isn't news, it is nothing new, it has nothing to do with gaming at all apart from two names.
Next up: A website that says "I like Battlefield 3". Only content on the page, I'm sure it would be just as amazing as this.
Actually you can take the beta for a good idea of it. In video game world, beta is basically the final product. Sure, they may tweak a graphical problem, tune a gun to make it stronger, or fix a glitch where you get under the map, but it is basically the final version.
You may be thinking of the word Alpha, which is where they run a basic version of the game to test the gameplay, graphics from that can change drastically.
Or so he says... They obviously tried to cover up something as the article states, maybe they just went with the trivial shit that a few people have tried to claim has made them angry. It is nothing new of people trying to plead insanity when they aren't, or blaming stuff like this on video games.
They should just not have automatic snipers then make it one shot kill, and remove quick scoping to some extent. This will mean that snipers won't be able to spam bullets, and will feel rewarded for a good shot.
People can complain that they camp, but in modes like Rush it was so much easier to overtake them on the leaderboards by doing the objects, which is one of the reasons I like BF more than CoD. You are rewarded for working as a team instead of camping in a corner. ...
CoD 1 remake was much, much harder than World at War. WaW did have some annoying moments, but Cod1 felt like every level was as hard as the hardest WaW level.
Just saying Battlefield 3 has far bigger maps, better graphics and destruction.
Exactly. Imagine if they didn't do this and on launch day the servers couldn't handle the load, would be a great day for all...