You need to speak for yourself as only you have the opinion that sucks here.
Even Virtual Boy has a real controller though. You just failed hard at trying to be cute.
No physical controller would be suicide for a console, there will always be a physical controller.
Go Brian! :D Congrats on finally getting big enough to not let Microsoft restrain you to only 360, good job!
You must also think DLC is a new game too. Black Ops had a 7/10 campaign, 4/10 multiplayer which was terrible, and zombies because if they didn't include it nobody would buy it anyway. Yeah, sure, new and good. As new as it's self and as good as World at War because that's all it was. Black ops was terrible. World at War was okay. MW2 was okay but still a series ruining game. MW3 is lol the same as MW2. Black Ops 2 will hold up the Treyarch tradition of not doing anything "gr...
And EA has released 25 games solely focused around Unicorns.
But it doesn't matter, they're all the same now anyways, even from the "different" developers. Call of Duty died at COD4, end of story. None have been even at the level of "Okay" after that.
Mmm, never realized there was a dinky thing that nobody would know because it's irrelevant that would use the branding of a Crapple device and then be stupid because you believe it is. Good going, I made a mistake because it does exist, and although still irrelevant, apparently the first thing I'm supposed to think of when I see "iPlayer" instead of the bigger brand. Have fun with yourselves now that you're geniuses because you're so smart about a service that won...
Yes, because Microsoft would let Apple program Apps for the 360. /s
Games shouldn't hold your hand. That's more of a development choice than taking more power out of the console, which will then lead to better quality games. The game its self is the easy part to make when making games, all the things behind the scenes are far more important, you can't understand if you've never made a game. And when I tlak about this, all is a generalization. Not ALL Japanese devs are bad, not at all. It's just when you have to rate all games from studios ...
No they're not, not even close. Developers of Japanese games usually get it done and work, but don't always take the best path to doing so like most other developers of other parts of the world. Some work VERY well and work for it to work more than just get it done, but most Japanese devs don't do that like other developers from Europe to the USA, which is one big reason why Japanese game devs won't ever make a better game.
*Has over 300 NES games, my own NES game, 400 Atari, 100 N64+SNES combined, and isn't even a gamer*
Sure thing man.
People don't buy this game, sheep do.
^ And they also wait until the game releases to start on their side of the project and steal the others advancements, all 3 of them. 2 years between a devs releases doesn't mean they worked on it all the time, they don't. This was probably only started in January-December with people like composers and artists getting stared before then.
I call it truth myself, but however you see it. -rolls eyes-
Hopefully Brian says "It's on the marketplace now" so I can give him my damn money already! Glad to see a fellow NES developer make such a big leap and do such an awesome job at it. Hopefully I can follow in somewhat similar and as successful footsteps!
Good luck Brian!
Nice, I'm trying to get a second copy just to hoard them, but it was $5 and I already had one. But yeah, did you at least get half way through it? It stats to get REALLY REALLY good about then. It had the terrible GBC port, but I don't count that at all. Not that it's a bad game, it's just not as good as the original at all. Doesn't it just beat the snot out of all other RPG's/AA's on the NES?! It's such a shame. :(
Can't tell if DLC or MW4.
Crystalis, ignored since 1990. Enough said. I doubt Star Tropics+Zelda 1+Final Fantasy combined could beat it in the day, it was that good. And oddly enough, made by SNK of all people...
There's no new games available for download on any console, so those aren't a valid argument either. Either way, it doesn't save you money, they make more money, and you get nothing, that's just the facts.
"The game only needs to be worth $8 in trade in value, so you could essentially get a $20 card for $8."
No, you get a $20 card if your game is worth $8 to them trade in, which is very new titles still that they'll put out for $60. If they give you a $20 card that they from Microsoft, and give you that with a $8 value trade in game, they must at least resell at TradeInValue+PriceOfCard. That means your game is at least $28 (If they buy the cards from Microsoft fo...