Where do people get these things? Pretty sure Pachter predicted PS4 to outsell Xbox One from the beginning. Also, he said that PS4 was kicking Xbox One's butt in terms of sales.
If you have some sources, then that's great, if not then it's not a good thing to lie about what other people have said.
Apparently not?
http://www.escapistmagazine...
I agree, but since people seem to find it interesting it's okay. There are way worse things going on on N4G.
I'm sorry, but you'll have to back up your claim that "entitled gamers" is a term coined and used predominantly (you go very far in suggesting that it's being used exclusively) by casual gamers or pundits with no insight.
To me this article seems very "stream of thought"-ish. You feel something to be true and write about it. As a result the article comes off as a bit flat.
I appreciate the point of view, and that you can actua...
Who needs Titanfall when we have CoD4: Modern Warfare. I mean, it's like antropology, why bother?
http://youtu.be/-j_LMV9e19E...
Am I right?
I wish he wouldn't take it down, but keep it up and give the money it earns to charity. THat'd be the best of all worlds.
Expect Syphon Filter! Wooo!
The re-release of Heavenly Sword 2? What did I miss?
EDIT: Oops, other people made that point. Sorry, don't mean to be redundant.
Many of the studies are small scale and use different tests and criteria, so the sum won't be entirely conclusive.
I don't think anyone went as far as concluding that kids who frequently play violent video games do not turn out normally. Also, it'd be interesting to see if the test adjusts for the high likelihood of these kids having nonchalant parents. If you prevent your kids from playing violent video games - at the very least you care.
What are you talking about? They conducted a study, and because they get a certain result they're fear-mongerers? Don't just look away from studies you don't like.
It's true that conclusions drawn from certain studies can be wrong, and that some studies have sketchy motivations behind them, but don't just automatically dismiss anything either.
Also, for all you know, you could be an exception, or not be able to tell, so who cares about yo...
Why would you use the Forum as source and not the actual Tweet? I mean, don't get me wrong, Twitter is a terrible source and rarely fit for N4G, but Google-translating a forum breaks new ground.
My pleasure :)
"Update: As per the Japanese PlayStation site, this update is for ‘software stability’."
Also, studios like Rare make the industry better.
Oh, wait. They don't anymore. Why is that?
Let's hope it also suffers the fate of selling over four million in four months.
Shocking? I guess if you compare it to Gears, this could be a little surprising, but I wasn't aware that we even knew what this game was going to be like just yet. I'd like it have multiplayer, and it looks co-op friendly in pictures, but I don't know.
@erathol
The expectations aren't "self-made". In fact, there's this new thing the kids are doing called "market analysis" and "focus-groups". Fact of the matter is that
A) You're gonna have to make a dazzling game if you want a new IP to sell.
B) Dazzling games cost a lot of money to make.
C) If they turn out bad (everyone can run into problems) it's extremely expensive to delay the game or have...
Yeah, you can easily make a good game and have it be unprofitable. Studios have gone bankrupt after making decent games. The returns needed on the biggest AAA titles are insane.
100? That's over 9000!